Mahesh Kumar Choudhary vs Union Of India Through Superintendent … on 31 July, 2025

0
29

[ad_1]

passed in Criminal Miscellaneous No.21696 of 2014

and finally vide common order dated 15.04.2015 passed in

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 20667 of 2014 and 24447 of 2017,

the bail applications of the aforesaid three accused persons came

to be rejected.

5. Thereafter the above three accused-

petitioners once again had attempted to secure bail and filed the

Criminal Miscellaneous No.57055 of 2015 wherein vide order

dated 01.06.2016, a coordinate Bench of this Court had enlarged

them on bail. However, later on, it was revealed that they had

conveniently suppressed the material fact regarding their earlier

unsuccessful attempts. In paragraph-02 of their bail application,

the accused-petitioners therein had mentioned that no previous

applications seeking regular or anticipatory bail was ever filed.

It was further brought to the notice of the coordinate Bench of

this Court that astonishingly the check-list appended along with

the application also did not disclose their previous bail

applications. The check-list appended with the case record,
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48026 of 2021 dt.31-07-2025

which was placed before the Bench, not only failed to disclose

the earlier attempts that were rejected but also mentioned three

cases in which bail applications were allowed.

[ad_2]

Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here