‘Sanjay Parihar (J).
1. The appellant, facing prosecution in case FIR No.30/2022 for offences
u/s 18, 19, and 20 of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967
(hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’), has thrown challenge to the order
dated 08.11.2024 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the impugned order)
passed by the Special Judge (UAPA) Anantnag, in terms whereof he
has been denied concession of bail.
2. The appellant claims to be innocent having been falsely implicated in
case FIR No.30/2022 and that the allegations leveled against him were
that on 06.05.2022, he tried to escape from cordon and search
operation at Akad Forest falling within the jurisdiction of Police
Station, Pahalgam, which is totally false as he was arrested a day
prior. He further claims to have neither made any disclosure nor any
recovery has been affected from him and during trial as many as 7
witnesses have been examined who did not depose anything
incriminating against him. He claims to have been made as human
shield by security forces and thereafter roped in a false case.
[ad_1]
Source link