Though the submissions made by the
learned APP are in consonance with the
material in the charge sheet, still
considering the fact that the offence alleged
is not exclusively punishable with death or
imprisonment for life, the prayer for bail
deserves consideration. The prayer deserves
consideration in view of the fact that
investigation is complete and charge sheet has
been filed and the learned APP has stated that
the injured being out of danger and no gainful
purpose would be served by keeping the
applicant behind the bar. The facts and
circumstances of the crime are also of not
such nature for not accepting the prayer for
bail for the offences which are not punishable
with sentence as stated here in above. It will
deserve consideration as the apprehension
expressed by the learned APP of being
likelihood of tampering prosecution witnesses
can be taken care of by imposing suitable
conditions. {Para 2}
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
BAIL APPLICATION NO.1532 OF 2014
Lakhya alias Nikhil Prakash Kshirsagar V/s. The State of Maharashtra .
CORAM : P.D.KODE, J.
DATE : 29TH OCTOBER, 2014
Citation: 2014:BHC-AS:23542
Learned APP has objected the prayer
for bail on the ground of the involvement of
the applicant being borne from the FIR,
statement of the injured and eye witnesses. It
is submitted that during the course of
investigation, a Sword was recovered from the
house of the applicant. Learned APP contended
that considering the manner in which the crime
has taken place, the prayer for bail may be
negatived. It is her submission that co-accused are
having previous antecedents.
2. Though the submissions made by the
learned APP are in consonance with the
material in the charge sheet, still
considering the fact that the offence alleged
is not exclusively punishable with death or
imprisonment for life, the prayer for bail
deserves consideration. The prayer deserves
consideration in view of the fact that
investigation is complete and charge sheet has
been filed and the learned APP has stated that
the injured being out of danger and no gainful
purpose would be served by keeping the
applicant behind the bar. The facts and
circumstances of the crime are also of not
such nature for not accepting the prayer for
bail for the offences which are not punishable
with sentence as stated here in above. It will
deserve consideration as the apprehension
expressed by the learned APP of being
likelihood of tampering prosecution witnesses
can be taken care of by imposing suitable
conditions.
3. In view of the above, the applicant is
directed to be released on bail in connection
with C.R.No.54 of 2014 registered with the
Bund Garden Police Station, Pune for the
offences punishable under Sections 307, 323,
504, 506 r/w.34 of the Indian Penal Code upon
executing a P.R.Bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/-
with two solvent sureties in the like amount
on the following conditions.
(I) The applicant after release shall not
enter Pune District until further orders.
However, the applicant is permitted to attend
Pune city only for the limited purpose of
attending the Court on the dates fixed in case
against him.
(II) The applicant shall inform his address
to the investigating officer and shall not
change the same without prior permission of
the trial Court and shall attend the concerned
police station for the relevant area on every
alternate Monday.
(III) The applicant shall not indulge in any
activity of tampering the prosecution material
and/or intimidating, coercing, threatening or
pressurizing the prosecution witnesses.
(IV) The applicant shall not misuse the
bail granted to him by this order for
committing any other offence.
4. Accordingly, the Bail Application
stands disposed of.
(P.D.KODE, J.)