[ad_1]
Rajasthan High Court – Jodhpur
Anada Ram vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jd:33985) on 1 August, 2025
[2025:RJ-JD:33985]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7781/2025
1. Anada Ram S/o Adu Ram, Aged About 27 Years, Village
Bheemguda, Ps Sarwana, Dist. Jalore. (Lodged In Sub
Jail, Sanchore, Dist. Jalore)
2. Adu Ram S/o Kohala Ram, Aged About 69 Years, Village
Bheemguda, Ps Sarwana, Dist. Jalore. (Lodged In Sub
Jail, Sanchore, Dist. Jalore)
----Petitioners
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jagmal Singh Choudhary, Sr. Adv.
Assisted by Mr. Pradeep Choudhary
and Ms. Sampati Choudhary.
For Respondent(s) : Mr. HS Jodha, PP.
Mr. Chaturbhuj for comaplainant.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MUKESH RAJPUROHIT
Order
01/08/2025
1. This application for bail under Section 483 of BNSS (Section
439 Cr.P.C.) has been filed by the petitioners, who have been
arrested in connection with C.R. No.57/2025, registered at Police
Station Sarwana, Jalore, for the offences under Sections 74,
109(1), 115(2), 126(2), 117(2), 118(2) and 3(5) of BNS, 2023.
2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material
available on record.
3. As per the prosecution story, while the complainant’s mother
was crossing the land of petitioners Anada Ram and Adu Ram,
both petitioners allegedly attacked the complainant’s mother. It is
(Downloaded on 05/08/2025 at 09:27:10 PM)
[2025:RJ-JD:33985] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-7781/2025]
alleged that petitioner Adu Ram was armed with a sharp weapon
(axe), while petitioner Anada Ram was armed with a lathi.
4. Learned Senior Counsel for the petitioners submits that he does
not wish to press the bail application at this stage on behalf of
petitioner No.2 – Adu Ram, who was allegedly armed with a sharp
weapon (axe). However, he seeks liberty to file a fresh bail
application after completion of investigation and filing of charge-
sheet by the Investigating Officer.
5. As regards petitioner No.1 – Anada Ram, learned Senior
Counsel submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in
this matter. It is contended that the allegations against him are
not grave in nature, as he was allegedly armed with a lathi and
the injuries attributed to injured are blunt in nature. It is further
submitted that the trial is likely to take a considerable time to
conclude.
6. Learned counsel for the complainant submits that he has no
objection to the bail application of petitioner No.2 – Adu Ram
being not pressed at this stage, but strongly opposes the bail
application of petitioner No.1 – Anada Ram. He submits that
petitioner No.1 caused a fracture injury to the leg of the
complainant’s mother, as evident from photographs available in
the case diary. Due to this injury, she is presently unable to move.
7. Learned Public Prosecutor has also vehemently opposed the
bail application and submits that both petitioners acted in
connivance, and therefore, are not entitled to the benefit of bail.
8. Having considered the rival submissions, the nature of
allegations and considering the fact that petitioner No.1 – Anada
(Downloaded on 05/08/2025 at 09:27:10 PM)
[2025:RJ-JD:33985] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-7781/2025]
Ram is alleged to be armed with a lathi and the injuries attributed
by him are blunt and not dangerous to life, and taking into
account the likelihood of delay in conclusion of the trial, and
without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this
Court deems it just and proper to enlarge petitioner No.1 – Anada
Ram on bail.
9. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 of BNSS
(439 Cr.P.C.) qua petitioner No.2 – Adu Ram is dismissed as not
pressed with liberty as prayed and petitioner No.1- Anada Ram is
allowed. It is ordered that the accused-petitioner No.1-Anada
Ram S/o Adu Ram, arrested in connection with C.R.
No.57/2025, registered at Police Station Sarwana, Jalore, shall be
released on bail, if not wanted in any other case, provided he
furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- and two sureties of
Rs.25,000/- each, to the satisfaction of learned trial court, for his
appearance before that court on each & every date of hearing and
whenever called upon to do so till completion of the trial.
(MUKESH RAJPUROHIT),J
115-/Jitender//-
(Downloaded on 05/08/2025 at 09:27:10 PM)
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
[ad_2]
Source link