State Of Meghalaya vs . Gopal Krishan Gour on 5 August, 2025

0
21

Mr. V.K. Mahajan, Adv.

Mr. P. Kumar, Adv.

Heard Mr. S. Pandit, learned counsel for the respondent. Also heard Ms.
S. Ain, learned counsel for the State petitioner.

In course of hearing, the learned GA has submitted that since the
respondent has referred to the seizure list as well as other materials which have
been produced at the bar today, it would be necessary for the prosecution to
confirm the authenticity of such assertion which can be done so only on
production of the relevant case diary.

Accordingly, as prayed for, let the case diary of Araimile P.S. Case No.
25(05)2024 under Section 406/417/420/465 IPC be produced before this Court
on the next date fixed.

[ad_1]

Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here