Lakshmanan vs State Of Kerala on 30 July, 2025

0
34

This Criminal Revision petition has been filed

challenging the concurrent finding of conviction and sentence in

a prosecution under Sections 465 and 471 of IPC.

2. The petitioner along with the 2 nd accused faced trial

for the offences punishable under Sections 409, 419, 465, 467,

471, 477A read with 34 of IPC before the Judicial First Class

Magistrate Court-I, Chengannur(for short, the trial court) in

C.C. No. 175/95.

3. The petitioner was the Executive Officer of the

Pandanadu Panchayath during the period from December 1991

to March 1992. The 2 nd accused was the president of the said

Panchayath during the said period. The prosecution case in

short is that, while the petitioner and the 2 nd accused were

working in the above said capacity, during the aforementioned

period, the Panchayath implemented a scheme for providing

power supply to the houses of selected members of the people

belonging to Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes and

economically backward community of that Panchayath with

‘united fund’ sanctioned to the Panchayath by the District

Council, Alappuzha. It is alleged that, the petitioner and the 2 nd

2025:KER:56484

accused colluded together with a common intention of

misappropriating amount from the above mentioned fund and

dishonestly forged quotations, increment vouchers, etc., in the

name of CW1, the proprietor of M/s C. Chacko and Sons,

Mavelikkara and used the forged documents as genuine and

thereby withdrew ₹30,105/- from the ‘united fund’ and they got

the electric wiring work of 130 houses done through CW2 by

paying a nominal amount of ₹1,100/- and misappropriated the

balance amount of ₹29,005/-. It is further alleged that, for

misappropriating the amount from the above fund, the

petitioner falsified accounts and deceived treasury and bank

authorities by impersonation.

[ad_1]

Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here