[ad_1]
Supreme Court – Daily Orders
Cbi vs Dheeraj Wadhawan on 5 August, 2025
Author: Sanjay Kumar
Bench: Sanjay Kumar
1
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. OF 2025
(arising out of SLP (Crl.) No. 3959/2025)
CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ..... APPELLANT(S)
VERSUS
DHEERAJ WADHAWAN ..... RESPONDENT(S)
O R D E R
Leave granted.
The Central Bureau of Investigation is the appellant before
us. It is aggrieved by the order dated 09.09.2024 passed by the
High Court of Delhi in Bail Application No. 2040/2024, whereby the
respondent, Dheeraj Wadhawan, was granted bail on medical grounds
in connection with First Information Report No. RC2242022A0001
dated 20.06.2022 registered with the CBI, AC-VI/SIT, New Delhi, for
the offence(s) punishable under Sections 409, 420, 477A and 120B of
the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Section 13(2) read with Section
13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.
By order dated 23.05.2025, this Court noted the fact that the
respondent, Dheeraj Wadhawa, had secured bail on medical grounds
and opined that it would be necessary to ascertain the status of
his health presently. He was, accordingly, referred for examination
Signature Not Verified
of
Digitally signed by his medical condition by a Committee of Doctors to be
babita pandey
Date: 2025.08.06
17:24:14 IST
constituted by the Superintendent of the Grant Government Medical
Reason:
College and Sir J J Group of Hospitals, Mumbai, Maharashtra.
2Pursuant to the said order, a team of 11 Doctors undertook the
physical examination of the respondent, Dheeraj Wadhawan, and
furnished report dated 09.07.2025. The health parameters of the
respondent, Dheeraj Wadhawan, under the heads of General Medicine,
Dermatology, General Surgery, Psychiatry, Cardiology, Pulmonary
Medicine, ENT, Neurosurgery, Urology, Nephrology and Orthopedics
were examined and the Committee opined that there was no necessity
for hospitalization of the respondent, Dheeraj Wadhawan, at present
and all that was required was continuation of ongoing medication
apart from physiotherapy and back strengthening exercises. The
final conclusion of the Committee was that the respondent, Dheeraj
Wadhawan, required regular and periodic follow-up with various
departments for his spinal ailments and also required to continue
physiotherapy as part of his treatment plan on an outpatient basis
with other concerned specialists for his ongoing medical
conditions.
In the light of the aforestated report, it is clear that the
respondent, Dheeraj Wadhawan, does not need to attend the hospital
on a daily basis, whereby he could assert entitlement to
continuation of the bail granted to him on medical grounds. All
that is required as per the aforestated report of the Committee is
that he should follow up periodically with the Doctors concerned.
We, therefore, see no good grounds to continue the bail
granted on medical grounds to the respondent, Dheeraj Wadhawan, by
the High Court of Delhi.
Needless to state, if and when the respondent, Dheeraj
Wadhawan, requires any urgent or any specialist treatment, the jail
3authorities and the CBI shall ensure that he is provided such
treatment immediately.
Subject to the above, the appeal is allowed and the order
dated 09.09.2024 passed by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi in
Bail Application No. 2040/2024 is set aside.
The respondent, Dheeraj Wadhawan, shall surrender within a
period of two weeks from today.
We, however, clarify that this order has been passed only on
consideration of the medical grounds on the strength of which the
respondent, Dheeraj Wadhawan, secured bail from the High Court and
we have not gone into the merits of the matter.
Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.
………………….J.
(SANJAY KUMAR)………………….J.
(SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA)
NEW DELHI;
AUGUST 05, 2025.
4
ITEM NO.8 COURT NO.13 SECTION II-D
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No. 3959/2025
[Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 09-09-2024 in
BA No. 2040/2024 passed by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi]CBI Petitioner(s)
VERSUSDHEERAJ WADHAWAN Respondent(s)
Date : 05-08-2025 This petition was called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH CHANDRA SHARMAFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Suryaprakash V Raju, A.S.G.
Mr. Mukesh Kumar Maroria, AOR
Mr. Annam Venkatesh, Adv.
Mr. Meerusagar Samantary, Adv.
Mr. Hitarth Raja, Adv.
Mr. Zoheb Hussain, Adv.
For Respondent(s) Mr. Abhishek Manu Singhvi, Sr. Adv.
Mr. Vikas Singh, Sr. Adv.
Mr. Ashish Verma, Adv.
Mrs. Iti Agarwal, Adv.
Mr. Debopriyo Moulik, Adv.
Mr. Vijay Kari Singh, Adv.
Ms. Deepika Kalia, Adv.
Mr. Vasudha Singh, Adv.
Mr. Sudeep Chandra, Adv.
Mr. Yunus Malik, Adv.
Mr. Vivek Kumar Singh, Adv.
Mr. Avishkar Singhvi, Adv.
Mr. Samir Malik, AORUPON hearing the counsel, the Court made the following
O R D E RLeave granted.
The appeal is allowed in terms of the signed order.
Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.
(Babita Pandey) (Preeti Saxena)
Astt. Registrar-cum-PS Court Master (NSH)
(Signed order is placed on the file)
[ad_2]
Source link


