Madhya Pradesh High Court
Rajendra Singh Panwar vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 6 August, 2025
Author: Subodh Abhyankar
Bench: Subodh Abhyankar
NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2025:MPHC-IND:20958
1 MCRC-29698-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
AT INDORE
BEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUBODH ABHYANKAR
ON THE 6 th OF AUGUST, 2025
MISC. CRIMINAL CASE No. 29698 of 2025
RAJENDRA SINGH PANWAR
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
Appearance:
Shri Amar Singh Rathore - Advocate for the applicant.
Shri Tarun Pagare - G.A. appearing on behalf of Advocate General.
ORDER
1. They are heard. Perused the case diary / challan papers.
2. This is the second bail application filed by the applicant under
Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 / 439 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, as he /
she is implicated in connection with Crime No.451/2024 registered at Police
Station Kanwan, District Dhar (MP) for offence punishable under Section
126(2), 191(2), 191(3), 190, 296, 115(2), 125, 324(4), 351(3), 109 of BNS,
2023. The applicant is lodged in jail since 24/02/2025.
3. Allegation against the applicant is of assault along with other 7
accused persons.
4. Counsel for the applicant has submitted that the main accused
Ishwar has already been granted bail by this Court in M.Cr.C.
No.24648/2025 vide order dated 30/06/2025 and the case of the present
applicant is on better footing as although it is alleged against the applicant
Signature Not Verified
Signed by: KHEMRAJ JOSHI
Signing time: 8/7/2025
11:44:18 AM
NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2025:MPHC-IND:20958
2 MCRC-29698-2025
that he assaulted with a stick to Ishwar S/o Dodiya of complainant party,
against whom also, a case has been registered and otherwise also, he has
criminal antecedents under Section 307 registered at crime No.379/2022 and
crime No.234/2023 under Section 327, 384, 341, 323 of IPC. Thus, it is
submitted that the complainant side also had criminal antecedents and in
such circumstances, further custody of the applicant is not necessary and
even otherwise, the dispute in the present case had arisen out of a land
dispute.
5. Counsel for the respondent / State, on the other hand has opposed
the prayer and it is submitted that no case for grant of bail is made out.
6. Having considered the rival submissions and on perusal of the case
diary, this Court finds force with the contentions raised by learned counsel
for the applicant, and further taking note of the fact that the final conclusion
of the trial is likely to take sufficient long time, in the considered opinion of
this Court, the applicant’s application deserves to be allowed.
7. Accordingly, without commenting on the merits of the case, the
application filed by the applicant is allowed. The applicant is directed to be
released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/-
(rupees twenty five thousand) with one solvent surety of the like amount to
the satisfaction of the trial Court for his/her regular appearance before the
trial Court during trial with a condition that he / she shall remain present
before the court concerned during trial and shall also abide by the conditions
enumerated under Section 437 (3) Criminal Procedure Code, 1973.
Certified copy as per rules.
Signature Not Verified
Signed by: KHEMRAJ JOSHI
Signing time: 8/7/2025
11:44:18 AM
NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2025:MPHC-IND:20958
3 MCRC-29698-2025
(SUBODH ABHYANKAR)
JUDGE
krjoshi
Signature Not Verified
Signed by: KHEMRAJ JOSHI
Signing time: 8/7/2025
11:44:18 AM