Introduction
The gig economy—a swiftly expanding landscape characterized by flexible, temporary, and task-based work—has transformed the livelihoods of millions. Intermediary platforms like Uber, Zomato, Swiggy, Urban Company, etc., are increasingly enabling workers to function as “independent contractors” as opposed to full-fledged employees. This model gives a unique selling point of flexibility and autonomy, but with that comes unique vulnerabilities for gig workers, with harassment at the workplace being one such issue. This paper will discuss how legal loopholes, regulatory vagueness, and lack of traditional structures facilitate harassment in the gig economy, and what real and effective protections might look like.
The Gig Economy: New Realities, New Risks
Gig work typically involves accepting short-term, on-demand jobs through online platforms or mobile apps. For a lot of people, it serves as a way to earn extra cash or even as a full-time job, all without the need for formal contracts, set hours, or guaranteed benefits. But this flexibility can come at a cost, as it often strips away the protections that come with traditional employment. Women, in particular, encounter unique challenges—like working late hours, traveling alone, or going into private homes—which can lead to situations where harassment is a real concern.
Defining “Workplace” and “Employee”: The Roots of Legal Ambiguity
The Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition, and Redressal) Act, 2013, commonly known as the POSH Act, was introduced in India to create safer work environments for women. It mandates that organizations set up Internal Committees (ICs), clearly define what constitutes workplace sexual harassment, and put in place processes for addressing complaints. One of the key features of this Act is its broad definition of “workplace,” which includes any location an employee visits as part of their job, and it also has an expansive view of who qualifies as an “employee,” encompassing contract and temporary workers as well. However, despite this wide-ranging language, gig workers often find themselves without adequate protection. Many platform companies label their workers as “independent contractors” instead of employees. For instance, when Ola dismissed a harassment complaint filed under the POSH Act, they argued that their drivers aren’t technically their “employees,” which means they feel no responsibility to act. While some courts have challenged this stance, criticizing platforms for shirking their duties, the situation remains murky: the legal status of gig workers as employees is still unclear, leaving many complaints unresolved.
Legal Loopholes: How Gig Workers Fall Through the Cracks
The implications of this uncertainty are significant:
• Lack of Grievance Mechanisms: Most gig platforms aren’t legally required to set up Internal Complaints (ICs) or adhere to other Prevention of Sexual Harassment (POSH) protocols.
• No Formal Accountability: When harassment happens, these platforms often sidestep responsibility, claiming there’s no formal employment relationship. This leaves victims without a clear path to seek justice.
• Invisibility of Gig Workers: The fleeting, solitary, and frequently remote nature of gig work makes it even harder to detect, report, and investigate harassment cases.
• Limited Social Support: Many gig workers don’t have the social or financial resources to take legal action on their own, especially when the company turns a blind eye or offers no support.
• Inequitable Protection: While platforms may carry out extensive background checks on workers, they often don’t apply the same level of scrutiny or accountability to customers, putting workers at greater risk.
The Courts and the Call for Reform
Indian courts have shown a surprisingly progressive side at times. Take the Karnataka High Court, for example, which pushed back against Ola’s limited perspective. It pointed out the company’s shortcomings in creating a safe environment and stressed that cab aggregators have a duty to tackle harassment complaints. Additionally, courts have occasionally taken a broader view of the POSH Act, looking at operational control instead of just legal definitions, which has helped include some gig workers under its protections. However, the outcomes can vary significantly, largely depending on how judges interpret and apply the law.
Comparative Shortcomings: What’s Missing?
In the gig economy, some crucial safeguards are sorely lacking, particularly when it comes to harassment. Here are a few key areas that need attention:
• Mandatory Redressal Systems: Many platforms don’t have strong, required internal complaint systems or anti-harassment policies in place.
• Clear Legal Status: The unclear classification of gig workers leaves them without essential legal protections and avenues for recourse.
• Awareness and Training: Often, both workers and clients/customers aren’t properly educated about what harassment looks like and how to report it, which results in underreporting and a troubling normalization of abuse.
• No Customer Accountability: Unlike traditional employees, gig workers face minimal checks on customer behavior, which can seriously undermine their sense of security.
Towards Inclusive Legal Protections: Recommendations
To truly safeguard gig workers from harassment, we need a united approach in terms of legal and policy measures:
• Broaden Legal Definitions: It’s time to revise the POSH Act and related labor laws to include gig and platform workers. We should redefine what we mean by “employee” and “workplace” to encompass digital and remote settings, as well as interactions with customers.
• Ensure Platform Accountability: Gig platforms must be required to create POSH-compliant internal committees, provide training and awareness for both workers and customers, and implement effective mechanisms for addressing complaints.
• Make Justice Accessible: We need to reduce the hurdles for filing complaints and guarantee that platforms offer support during investigations, no matter how workers are classified.
• Encourage Judicial Activism: Until we see legislative changes that fill these gaps, courts should actively interpret laws in a way that protects vulnerable workers.
• Increase Transparency: Platforms ought to share data on complaints and their resolutions, holding themselves accountable to regulators and the public alike.
conclusion
The gig economy is here to stay, but we can’t let its flexible nature compromise worker safety and dignity. As digital platforms become a big part of our everyday lives and jobs, our legal systems must adapt to these new realities. Unfortunately, harassment in the gig economy continues to be a problem—not because the law is quiet, but because it’s stuck in the past. We urgently need legislative changes to clarify employment status, explicitly extend anti-harassment protections, and create practical ways for workers to seek justice. It’s essential to protect all workers, no matter where or for whom they work.
Also Read:
Rights of undertrial prisoners in India
How To Send A Legal Notice In India