Patna High Court – Orders
Vikaram Kumar @ Vikram Kumar @ Kailu … vs The State Of Bihar on 11 August, 2025
Author: Nawneet Kumar Pandey
Bench: Nawneet Kumar Pandey
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.47979 of 2025
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-412 Year-2016 Thana- GAYA MUFASIL District- Gaya
======================================================
Vikaram Kumar @ Vikram Kumar @ Kailu Yadav S/o Ramotar Yadav
Resident of Village- Lakhaua, P.S- Wazirganj, District - Gaya
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
with
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 50984 of 2025
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-412 Year-2016 Thana- GAYA MUFASIL District- Gaya
======================================================
Pintu Yadav Son of Nirmal Yadav Resident of Village- Sabalchak, P.S.-
Tankuppain the District- Gaya
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
(In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 47979 of 2025)
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sanjeev Kumar
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Ram Sumiran Rai
(In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 50984 of 2025)
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Braj Nandan Kumar Tiwary
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Ram Sevak Choudhary
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR
PANDEY
ORAL ORDER
2 11-08-2025
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners as
well as the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. The petitioners are seeking regular bail in
connection with Gaya Muffasil P.S. Case No. 412 of 2016,
registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148,
149, 323, 341, 386, 435, 379 of the IPC under Sections 14, 16,
17, 18, 20, 38, 40 of UAP Act and Sections 17 of C.L.A, Act.
3. As per prosecution case, about 20 miscreants
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.47979 of 2025(2) dt.11-08-2025
2/3
attacked the construction site of the company of the informant
which was engaged in construction of a rail bridge and set on
fire a number of equipments including the truck tippers,
Excavator, Hydra, Sumo vehicle, a motorcycle and Tata P & H
Crane. The miscreants also threatened the employees present
there at the gunpoint and assaulted them and took away their
mobile phones and cash amounting to Rs.50,000/- from
individual workers. The name of the petitioners transpired as
one of the miscreants during investigation.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted
that the petitioners were not arrested at the spot and nothing was
recovered from their possession. Their names have figured only
in the confessional statement of co-accused Kamlesh Ram @
Kamlesh Khar @ Kamlesh Chandravanshi. He has further
submitted that other co-accused persons have been granted bail.
5. Considering the above-mentioned facts and
circumstances, let the petitioners above-named, are directed to
furnish bail bond and on doing so, the court below shall release
the petitioners on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/-
each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction
of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in connection with
Gaya Muffasil P.S. Case No. 412 of 2016, subject to the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.47979 of 2025(2) dt.11-08-2025
3/3
following conditions that the petitioners shall cooperate in
the disposal of trial and make themselves available as and
when required by the court.
6. Before accepting the bail bond, the learned court
below shall verify whether any incriminating article was
recovered from the possession of the petitioner or not.
(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J)
Nirmal/-
U T