Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side)
Ashok Dey & Ors vs Unknown on 11 August, 2025
11.08.2025
Item No.32
Ct. No. 446
KS
C.R.M. (A) 2755 of 2025
In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya
Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Nabadwip Police Station
Case No.479 of 2022 dated 13.10.2022 under Sections 323/ 504/ 506/ 365/ 120B
of the Indian Penal Code.
And
In the matter of: Ashok Dey & Ors.
...... Petitioners
Mr. Amanul Islam
Mr. Sourav Mukherjee
....For the Petitioners
Ms. Baishali Basu
Mr. Abhinabha Mukherjee
....For the State
1.
Heard the submission of both the learned advocates appearing on
behalf of the petitioners as well as for the prosecution.
2. Perused the materials from the Case Diary and the statements of
various witnesses recorded under Section 180 of the B.N.S.S.
including that of the brother of the de facto complainant as appearing
at page 28 of the Case Diary and on further consideration that parents
of the de facto complainant are no more in the world, this Court finds
no reason for custodial interrogation of the petitioners and the prayer
for anticipatory bail on behalf of the petitioners stands allowed. The
petitioners are the near relatives of the de facto complainant.
3. Accordingly, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the
petitioners subject to fulfillment of certain conditions other than
compliance of the conditions laid down in Section 482(2) of the
B.N.S.S.
4. Accordingly, in the event of arrest, the petitioners shall be released on
bail upon furnishing bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only)
2
each, with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the
arresting officer and also be subject to the conditions as laid down
under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S. and on further condition that the
petitioners shall meet with the Investigating Officer once in a month
till the conclusion of investigation and on condition that the
petitioners shall appear on every date before the jurisdictional Court
on the dates fixed for appearance and in default, the jurisdictional
Court will pass appropriate order to secure the presence of the
petitioners in Court. In default of any of the conditions, the
Prosecution will be at liberty to pray for cancellation of bail.
5. Thus, the application for anticipatory bail is allowed.
6. Accordingly, the application being, C.R.M. (A) 2755 of 2025 stands
disposed of.
7. All parties shall act on the server copies of this order duly
downloaded from the official website of this Court.
8. Urgent certified website copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied
to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.
(CHAITALI CHATTERJEE (DAS), J.)