Gairo Devi vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jd:35064) on 5 August, 2025

0
4


Rajasthan High Court – Jodhpur

Gairo Devi vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jd:35064) on 5 August, 2025

[2025:RJ-JD:35064]

      HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                       JODHPUR
                 S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 5774/2025

Gairo Devi W/o Rama Ram, Aged About 43 Years, R/o Village
Chadar Madroop Tehsil Ramsar District Barmer
                                                                           ----Petitioner
                                          Versus
1.         State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor
2.         Ummeda Ram @ Ammeda Ram S/o Raju Ram, R/o Village
           Ramdev Mandir Chadar Madroop Tehsil Ramsar District
           Barmer
                                                                        ----Respondents


For Petitioner(s)               :     Mr. Siddharth Karwasra
For Respondent(s)               :     Mr. Prem Singh Panwar, Public
                                      Prosecutor
                                      Mr. Amardeep Lamba and Mr. Shiv
                                      Singh for the complainant



           HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MUKESH RAJPUROHIT

Order

05/08/2025

1. It is stated at the Bar that a compromise has been arrived at

between the parties and it is borne out from the compromise that

the complainant is not inclined to proceed further in the matter.

2. Learned counsel for the parties have placed reliance on a

decision of Supreme Court in case of Gian Singh V/s. State of

Punjab & Anr. [(2012) 10 SCC 303].

3. It is also submitted that upon the aforementioned

compromise, the learned court below vide order dated

02.07.2025, has verified the compromise between the parties to

the extent of the offence under Section 420 of IPC and has

discharged the petitioners of the offence under Section 420 of IPC.

(Downloaded on 11/08/2025 at 09:32:58 PM)

[2025:RJ-JD:35064] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-5774/2025]

However, the learned court below has declined to verify the

compromise with regards to the offence under Sections 467, 468,

471, 120-B of IPC on the ground that the said offences are non-

compoundable.

4. In view of compromise arrived at between the parties as well

as the aforesaid order dated 22.07.2024 of the learned court

below and applying the ratio in decision of Gian Singh Vs. State

of Punjab & Anr. (supra), I deem it just and proper to invoke

inherent powers of this Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

5. Accordingly, the present misc. petition is allowed and the

F.I.R. No.24/2015 lodged at Police Station Ramsar, District Barmer

and all consequential proceedings for offences under Sections 467,

468, 471, 120-B of IPC, against the petitioners are hereby

quashed.

6. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.

(MUKESH RAJPUROHIT),J
127-Ramesh/-

(Downloaded on 11/08/2025 at 09:32:58 PM)

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here