Sanjay Patel vs The State Of Bihar on 11 August, 2025

0
19

Patna High Court – Orders

Sanjay Patel vs The State Of Bihar on 11 August, 2025

Author: Chandra Shekhar Jha

Bench: Chandra Shekhar Jha

                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                             CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.75261 of 2024
                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-180 Year-2024 Thana- BETTIAH CITY District- West
                                                       Champaran
                 ======================================================
                 Suresh Yadav Son of Bedar Yadav R/O Vill.- Bajaya Bairiya, Post- Damrapur,
                 Police Station- Sahodra, Bettiah, Dist.- West Champaran.

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar Patna

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                                                         with
                            CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 22683 of 2025
                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-180 Year-2024 Thana- BETTIAH CITY District- West
                                                       Champaran
                 ======================================================
                 Sanjay Patel S/o Late Bunela Patel R/o Village- Bhikhampur, P.S.- Sirisiya,
                 District- West Champaran

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 75261 of 2024)
                 For the Petitioner/s     : Mr. Dhananjay Kumar, Adv
                 For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Nagendra Prasad, APP
                 (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 22683 of 2025)
                 For the Petitioner/s     : Mr. Sharad Kumar Verma, Adv
                 For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Navin Kumar Pandey, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

7   11-08-2025

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.75261 of 2024

Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

petitioner and learned APP appearing on behalf of the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with

Bettiah Town P.S. Case No. 180 of 2024 registered for the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.75261 of 2024(7) dt.11-08-2025
2/7

offences under Section 414 of the IPC & Sections 8, 20 (b)(ii)

(c), 22 (c) and 23 (c) of the NDPS Act.

3. The petitioner is named in the F.I.R. and is in

custody since 20.04.2024.

4. As per FIR accused/petitioner upon raid

conducted by NCB found in possession of 4 kilograms of

charas.

5. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

petitioner submitted that from the bare perusal of the FIR it

can be gathered that recovery of ” charas like substance”

without even any preliminary scientific test ascertaining that it

was charas, sample was drawn and, therefore, entire

implication can be said to be made on the basis of suspicion.

It is submitted that even the charge-sheet was submitted

without obtaining the F.S.L. report and considering this aspect

one of the learned Co-ordinate Bench of this Court granted

bail to co-accused Faiyaz Miyan from whom there was

recovery of 15.636 kilograms of charas through Cr. Misc. No.

16906 of 2025 dated 02.07.2025. It is further submitted

that case of petitioner is on equal footing. Beside aforesaid, it
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.75261 of 2024(7) dt.11-08-2025
3/7

is submitted that petitioner was implicated falsely with this

case only for the reason as petitioner found involved in ten

more criminal cases of different nature, where he is on bail

and, therefore, petitioner implicated with the present case

with an aggravated version in planned manner by police.

6. For aforesaid false implication wife of petitioner

filed Cr.W.J.C. No. 1148 of 2024 before this Court, where

one of the learned Co-ordinate Bench of this Court through its

order dated 13.02.2025 as passed in aforesaid criminal writ

petition directed to take departmental action against SP

Bettiah and accordingly D.G.P. Bihar was directed for the said

action. It is pointed out that if the merit of the case otherwise

convincing in favour of petitioner, merely on the ground of

criminal antecedents bail of petitioner ordinarily should not be

rejected. In support of his submission learned counsel relied

upon the legal report of Hon’ble Supreme Court as available

through Prabhakar Tewari Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh

and Another, [(2020) 11 SCC 648]. While concluding the

argument it is submitted that till date only two prosecution

witnesses have been examined and trial of this case is not
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.75261 of 2024(7) dt.11-08-2025
4/7

likely to conclude in the near future.

7. Learned APP appearing on behalf of the State,

while opposing the prayer for bail fairly conceded that co-

accused Faiyaz Miyan was granted bail by learned Co-ordinate

Bench of this Court as submitted aforesaid.

8. In view of aforesaid factual submission and by

taking note of judicial parity as similarly situated co-accused

Faiyaz Miyan has already granted bail as discussed aforesaid,

coupled with the fact as petitioner remains in custody since

20.04.2024 and moreover, trial of this case is not likely to

conclude in the near future, accordingly above named

petitioner, is directed to be released on bail in connection with

Bettiah Town P.S. Case No. 180 of 2024 on furnishing bail

bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two

sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned

Exclusive Special Judge, NDPS, West Champaran at

Bettiah/concerned court, subject to the conditions as

mentioned under Section 480(3) of the B.N.S.S.

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 22683 of 2025
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.75261 of 2024(7) dt.11-08-2025
5/7

Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

petitioner and learned APP appearing on behalf of the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with

Bettiah Town P.S. Case No. 180 of 2024 registered for the

offences under Section 414 of the IPC & Sections 8, 20 (b)(ii)

(c), 22 (c) and 23 (c) of the NDPS Act.

3. The petitioner is named in the F.I.R. and is in

custody since 19.04.2024.

4. As per FIR accused/petitioner upon raid

conducted by NCB found in possession of 16.130 kilograms of

charas.

5. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

petitioner submitted that from the bare perusal of the FIR it

can be gathered that recovery of “charas like substance”

without even any preliminary scientific test ascertaining that it

was charas, sample was drawn and, therefore, entire

implication can be said to be made on the basis of suspicion.

It is submitted that even the charge-sheet was submitted

without obtaining the F.S.L. report and considering this aspect

one of the learned Co-ordinate Bench of this Court granted
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.75261 of 2024(7) dt.11-08-2025
6/7

bail to co-accused Faiyaz Miyan from whom there was

recovery of 15.636 kilograms of charas through Cr. Misc. No.

16906 of 2025 dated 02.07.2025. It is further submitted

that case of petitioner is on equal footing.

6. For aforesaid false implication wife of petitioner

filed Cr.W.J.C. No. 1148 of 2024 before this Court, where

one of the learned Co-ordinate Bench of this Court through its

order dated 13.02.2025 as passed in aforesaid criminal writ

directed to take departmental action against SP Bettiah and

accordingly D.G.P. Bihar was directed for the said action. It is

also submitted that petitioner found involved in one more

case, where he is on bail. While concluding the argument it is

submitted that till date only two prosecution witnesses have

been examined and trial of this case is not likely to conclude in

the near future.

7. Learned APP appearing on behalf of the State,

while opposing the prayer for bail fairly conceded that co-

accused Faiyaz Miyan was granted bail by learned Co-ordinate

Bench of this Court as submitted aforesaid.

8. In view of aforesaid factual submission and by
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.75261 of 2024(7) dt.11-08-2025
7/7

taking note of judicial parity as similarly situated co-accused

Faiyaz Miyan has already granted bail as discussed aforesaid,

coupled with the fact as petitioner remains in custody since

19.04.2024 and moreover, trial of this case is not likely to

conclude in the near future, accordingly above named

petitioner, is directed to be released on bail in connection with

Bettiah Town P.S. Case No. 180 of 2024 on furnishing bail

bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two

sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned

Exclusive Special Judge, NDPS Act, West Champaran at

Bettiah/concerned court, subject to the conditions as

mentioned under Section 480(3) of the B.N.S.S.

(Chandra Shekhar Jha, J.)
S.Tripathi/-

U       T
 

[ad_1]

Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here