[ad_1]
Patna High Court – Orders
Anil Yadav vs The State Of Bihar on 11 August, 2025
Author: Khatim Reza
Bench: Khatim Reza
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.52344 of 2025
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-135 Year-2006 Thana- WAJIRGANJ District- Gaya
======================================================
Anil Yadav S/O Sibu Yadav @ Shivlal Yadav R/O Vill.- Kaji Bigha, P.s.-
Tankuppa, District- Gaya
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Satyaveer Jha, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Nirmala Kumari, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KHATIM REZA
ORAL ORDER
2 11-08-2025
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
A.P.P for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with
Wazirganj (Tankuppa) P.S. Case No. 135 of 2006 dated
04.07.2006, instituted for the offence punishable under Sections
147, 148, 149, 302, 307, 353, 452, 333, 427, 342 of the Indian
Penal Code, Section 27 of the Arms Act, Section 3, 5 of
Explosive Substance Act, Section 17 of C.L.A. Act and Section
3 of the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act.
3. The prosecution case, in brief, is that on 03.07.2006
at about midnight, incriminating firing started on police
personnel upon which informant directed the police personnel to
fire in self-defence which continued for three hours. It is further
alleged that the miscreants claimed themselves of Maoist group
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.52344 of 2025(2) dt.11-08-2025
2/3
and they planted landmine to damage the police station and also
fired on police personnel due to which many police personnel
sustained injury and few of the officers have also died.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this
case. It is submitted that the F.I.R. has been lodged against 29
named accused persons as well as 300-400 unknown persons
and the petitioner is named accused person. It is submitted that
only on the basis of disclosure made by local Chowkidar, the
petitioner has been made accused in this case. It is submitted
that there is no specific allegation against the petitioner, rather,
the allegation against him is general and omnibus. It is also
submitted that several other accused persons have been granted
bail by this court as well as by other co-ordinate Benches of this
Court. It is submitted that Ganauri Manjhi and Ajay Kanu @
Ravi Jee @ Chandra Prakash have been granted bail vide order
dated 03.04.2013 and 22.12.2014 passed in Criminal
Miscellaneous Nos. 965 of 2011 and 18703 of 2014 respectively
by different co-ordinate Benches of this Court. It is further
submitted that Suresh Kahar @ Singh @ Suresh Chandrawansi
has been granted bail vide order dated 23.05.2023 passed in
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 23907 of 2023 by this Court.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.52344 of 2025(2) dt.11-08-2025
3/3
Lastly, it has been submitted that the petitioner is in custody
since 08.04.2025, having no criminal antecedent and charge-
sheet has been submitted in the case.
5. Learned A.P.P for the State opposes the prayer for
bail of the petitioner.
6. Having considered the facts and circumstances of
the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, let
the petitioner be released on bail upon furnishing bail bonds of
Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount
each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Gaya in
connection with Wazirganj P.S. Case No. 135 of 2006.
(Khatim Reza, J)
prabhat/-
U T
[ad_2]
Source link