Orissa High Court
Lili Naik vs State Of Odisha …. Opposite Party on 12 August, 2025
Author: V. Narasingh
Bench: V. Narasingh
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
ABLAPL No.9157 of 2025
1. Lili Naik .... Petitioners
2. Akarana Naik
Mr. B.R. Mohanty, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha .... Opposite Party
Mr. S.K. Lenka, ASC
CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH
ORDER
12.08.2025
Order No.
01. 1. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners and
learned counsel for the State.
2. The Petitioners are seeking pre-arrest bail in
connection with C.T. Case No.211(A) of 2008 pending
in the Court of learned S.D.J.M., Athagarh arising out
of Athagarh P.S. Case No.96 of 2008 for commission of
offence punishable under Sections 341/ 323/ 294/
324/ 354/ 307/ 506/ 34 of IPC.
3. Learned counsel for the State opposes such
prayer.
4. During the course of submission, learned
counsel for the Petitioners does not want to press this
ABLAPL in respect of the Petitioner No.2 (Akarana
Naik).
Page 1 of 2
5. In view of the same, the ABLAPL in respect of
the Petitioner No.2 (Akarana Naik) is disposed of as
withdrawn. Thus, the ABLAPL stands confined to the
Petitioner No.1 (Lili Naik).
6. Taking into account the nature of allegations,
and the Petitioner No.1 (Lili Naik) is a lady, it is
directed that on surrendering within three weeks hence
and moving for bail, the Petitioner No.1 (Lili Naik) shall
be released on bail by the learned Court in seisin on
such terms as deemed just and proper.
7. Accordingly, the ABLAPL stands disposed of.
(V. NARASINGH)
Judge
Soumya
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed
Signed by: SOUMYA RANJAN SAMAL
Reason: Authentication
Location: High Court of Orissa
Date: 14-Aug-2025 16:44:49
Page 2 of 2
[ad_1]
Source link