Bijay Prasad Singh vs The Central Bureau Of Investigation … on 6 August, 2025

0
5

Jharkhand High Court

Bijay Prasad Singh vs The Central Bureau Of Investigation … on 6 August, 2025

Author: Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

Bench: Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

                                                   [2025:JHHC:22166]


       IN     THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
                          A.B.A. No. 2560 of 2025
       Bijay Prasad Singh, aged about 75 years, s/o Kanta
       Prasad Singh, resident of 123, Swami Vivekanand
       Path, Adampur Chowk, P.O & P.S- Jagdishpur,
       District Bhagalpur -812001 (Bihar), Aadhar No.:
       6009 3768 6361.
                                                  .....  ...        Petitioner
                                 Versus
       The Central Bureau of Investigation (ACB), having its
       office at 2, Booty Road, Ranchi, 834008 (Jharkhand).
                                                    .....   ...     Opposite Party
                               --------

CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI

——

      For the Petitioner       :        Ms. Khushboo Kataruka, Advocate
      For the CBI              :        Mr. D.K. Bharti, Spl.P.P.
                               ------
06/ 06.08.2025     Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Spl.P.P.

appearing for the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI).

2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with

CBI FIR No. RC 05(A)/2012-AHD-R, registered for the offences under

Sections 420, 423, 424, 467, 468, 469, 471, 477-A, 120-B, 109 and 201

of the Indian Penal Code and Section 13(2) read with Sections 13(1)(d)

of the Prevention of Corruption Act, pending in the court of learned

AJC-XVIII-cum-Special Judge, CBI, Ranchi.

3. Ms. Khushboo Kataruka, learned counsel appearing for the

petitioner submits that the petitioner was the evaluator of the

examination conducted by the Jharkhand Public Service Commission

in the year 2003. She submits that the said exam was investigated by

the CBI on the direction passed in one W.P.(PIL). She further submits

that the allegation is made that this petitioner has provided 55 and 12

extra marks respectively to particular two candidates. She also submits

that now the chargesheet has already been submitted and in view that

-1-
[2025:JHHC:22166]

the petitioner may kindly be provided the privilege of anticipatory bail.

4. Mr. D.K. Bharti, learned Spl.P.P. appearing for the CBI has

opposed the prayer and submits that the allegations are there against

the petitioner, being the evaluator, of providing 55 and 12 extra marks

respectively to particular two candidates in the examination conducted

by the Jharkhand Public Service Commission.

5. During course of argument, learned counsel appearing for

the petitioner has pointed out that the petitioner is bed ridden and he is

having the ailment of Stiff Person Syndrome and to buttress her

arguments, she refers to Annexure-3, which is the document of AIIMS,

New Delhi as well as the certificate of Christian Medical College,

Vellore. She submits that in light of the ailment of the petitioner, the

facilities for access of justice in light of Section 12 of Rights of Persons

with Disabilities Act, 2016 may kindly be provided to the petitioner for

complying the formalities of obtaining the anticipatory bail.

6. Considering that the chargesheet has already been

submitted and during investigation, it appears that the petitioner has

co-operated in the investigation that’s why the CBI has not arrested

him and only allegation is there against the petitioner, being the

evaluator of the exam of providing 55 and 12 extra marks respectively

to particular two candidates, I am inclined to provide privilege of

anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

7. Accordingly, the petitioner, named above, is hereby

directed to surrender before the learned court within three weeks from

today, and in the event of his surrender/arrest, the petitioner, above

named, shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/-

(Rupees Twenty Five Thousand), with two sureties of the like amount

each, to the satisfaction of learned AJC-XVIII-cum-Special Judge,

-2-
[2025:JHHC:22166]

CBI, Ranchi, in connection with CBI FIR No. RC 05(A)/2012-AHD-R,

subject to the conditions as laid down under section 482(2) of the

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

8. The liberty is provided to the petitioner to move a petition

before the learned court, where the case is pending in light of Section

12 of Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 for making

appropriate arrangement in light of the said provisions and the learned

court will take into account and pass an appropriate order.

(Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.)
Amitesh/-

-3-



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here