Nainapatruni Nainipeddi … vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh on 12 August, 2025

0
5


Andhra Pradesh High Court – Amravati

Nainapatruni Nainipeddi … vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh on 12 August, 2025

APHC010056382024

                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
                                   AT AMARAVATI                      [3396]
                            (Special Original Jurisdiction)

                   TUESDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF AUGUST
                     TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
                                PRESENT
  THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
                      CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 721/2024
Between:
  1. NAINAPATRUNI @ NAINIPEDDI SURYANARAYANA, AGED 71
     YEARS, S/O. LATE SATYANARAYANA, R/O. CHINNAVEEDHI,
     BODDEPALLI, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT.
  2. PAIDI APPA RAO,, S/O. LATE SUIYANARAYANA, AGED 71 YEARS,
     R/O. MAIN VEEDHI, PANASAPETA,            WALTERU, SRIKAKULAM
     DISTRICT.
  3. PAIDI DHARMA RAO,, C/O. PAIDI APPA RAO, AGED 31 YEARS,
     R/O.2-57, CHINNAVEEDHI, CHINNA BODDEPALLI, BODDEPALLI ,
     SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT
                                           ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S)
                                  AND
  1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY SHO PS SOMPETA,
     SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT, THROUGH PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH
     COURT OF A.P,AMARAVATHI.
  2. BODDEPALLI SYAMALA, W/O TEJESWASWA RAO                AGED 45
     YEARS, OCC HOUSE WIFE R/O BODDEPALLI, PONDURU MANDAL
     SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT.
                                    ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S):
Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S):
  1. TOTA TEJESWARA RAO
Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S):
  1. P RAJKUMAR
  2. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP)
The Court made the following:
ORDER:

The instant Criminal Petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C has been filed,

by the Petitioners/Accused Nos.1 to 3, seeking to quash the proceedings

against them in Crime No.312 of 2023 on the file of Ponduru Police Station,
2

Srikakulam District registered for the offences under Sections 354 and 323

read with 34 IPC.

2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, Ms.K.Priyanka Lakshmi,

learned Assistant Public Prosecutor would submit that investigation in the

present crime has been completed and charge sheet has also been filed.

Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor would further submit that there are

specific allegations against the Petitioners and hence, this is not a fit case for

quashment.

3. Sri Tota Tejeswara Rao, learned counsel for the Petitioners would

submit that the petition may be disposed of dispensing with the presence of

the Petitioners before the trial Court.

4. Sri P.Rajkumar, learned counsel for Respondent No.2 is in attendance.

5. In that view, the Criminal Petition is disposed of. However, considering

the age of the Petitioners/Accused Nos.1 and 2, their presence before the trial

Court is dispensed with, except on the specific dates as directed by the trial

Court.

Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed.

________________________________________
Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
Date:12.08.2025
Dinesh
3

HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA

Crl.P.No.721 of 2024

Dt.12.08.2025

Dinesh



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here