Anto.A.V vs The United India Insurance Co.Ltd on 18 August, 2025

0
3

The petitioner opened a jewellery shop at Tirupur,

Tamil Nadu in 2009. Movable assets kept inside the premises of

the show room were insured with the 1 st respondent company

under Jewellers Block Policy for the period from 27.4.2011 to

midnight of 26.4.2012.

2. On 22.2.2012, at night some thieves broke into the

jewellery shop and committed theft of 36 kgs. of gold jewellery

and 2 kgs. of diamond studded gold jewellery. Tirupur police

registered crime No.333/2012 in connection with the

occurrence. Investigation has not been completed yet as five

absconding accused could not be traced and arrested.

3. Petitioner informed the 1st respondent company

about the incident. A Surveyor was deputed by the 1 st

respondent company. On 17.4.2012, Surveyor submitted his
2025:KER:62233

report. In the report the Surveyor stated that entire stock of

gold ornaments, etc. kept in the safe was still there and all

ornaments in the display windows including diamond studded

ornaments were taken away by the burglars. Surveyor found

that the petitioner had complied with all the warranties except

safe keeping of jewellery displayed in the windows in the safe

lockers after business hours.



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here