The State Of Apr Ep By Its Pp Hyd., vs Somarala Srinivasa Rao, 2 Others, on 19 August, 2025

0
4


which they were charged.

IA NO: 1 OF 2008(CRLAMP 1324 OF 2008

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated
in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to
condone the delay of the ”383” days in presenting the appeal against the
order of acquittal of the accused / respondents in C.C.No. 379 of 2005 on the
file of the J.F.C.M., Spl.Mobile Court, Eluru, dt. 28-02-2007.

Counsel for the Appellant:

1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP)

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. I V N RAJU

The Court made the following JUDGMENT:

1. This appeal, under section 378(3) & (1) of Code of Criminal Procedure,
1973 (for short, ‘Cr.P.C’) is preferred by the Appellant / State against the
judgment of acquittal rendered by the learned Judicial Magistrate of First
Class, Special Mobile Court, Eluru (for short, ‘the Trial Court’) in Calendar
Case No.379 of 2005 (old C.C.No.1334 of 2004) by its judgment dated
28.02.2007, acquitted the accused for the offences punishable under sections
496, 417 and 498A of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short, ‘IPC’).



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here