Jharkhand High Court
Rekhe @ Khela Hansda vs The State Of Jharkhand …. Opposite … on 18 August, 2025
Author: Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
Bench: Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
2025:JHHC:23915
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI
A.B.A. No. 4461 of 2025
----
1. Rekhe @ Khela Hansda, aged about 34 years, S/o Kishun Hansda
2. Stiphan @ Stiphan Murmu, aged about 50 years, S/o Late Hari
Murmu
3. Siril @ Siril Hansda, aged about 49 years, S/o Late Sangram Hansda
4. Ruju @ Arjun Murmu, aged about 36 years, S/o Hopna Murmu
5. Shankar @ Shankar Murmu, aged about 72 years, S/o Late Hari
Murmu
6. Bora @ Roben Murmu, aged about 52 years, S/o Shankar Murmu
7. Ramu @ Ramu Tudu, aged about 34 years, S/o Kishun Hansda
All are resident of – Bara Pangdo, PO and PS – Jirwabari, District –
Sahibganj .... Petitioners
-- Versus --
The State of Jharkhand .... Opposite Party
----
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
—
For the Petitioners :- Mr. Pratiush Lala, Advocate
For the State :- Mr. Shiv Shankar Kumar, Advocate
—-
04/18.08.2025 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioners as well as
the learned counsel appearing for the State.
2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with
Borio(J) P.S. Case No.352 of 2018, for the alleged offences registered
under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 332, 333, 353, 379, 307, 504 and 506
of Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of Arms Act pending in the Court of
learned C.J.M., Sahibganj.
3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the
allegations are made that 100 persons were assembled at the place of
occurrence and 13 persons have been named in the FIR. He submits that
–1– A.B.A. No. 4461 of 2025
2025:JHHC:23915
the petitioners have got no criminal antecedent as disclosed in paragraph
No.20 of the petition. He further submits that in identical situation one
co-accused has already been granted anticipatory bail in A.B.A. No.3193
of 2021.
4. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer and
submits that the allegations are there against the petitioners of abusing
and scuffling with the police party.
5. Considering that 100 persons were assembled at the place of
occurrence and 13 persons have been named in the FIR and the
petitioner has got no criminal antecedent as disclosed in paragraph No.20
of the petition and one co-accused has already been granted anticipatory
bail in A.B.A. No.3193 of 2021, I am inclined to provide anticipatory bail
to the petitioner.
6. Accordingly, the petitioners, above named, are hereby directed
to surrender before the learned Court within three weeks from today, and
in the event of their surrender/arrest, the petitioners, above named, shall
be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees
Twenty Five Thousand) each, with two sureties of the like amount each,
to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Sahibganj in connection with
Borio(J) P.S. Case No.352 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down
under Section 482(2) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
(Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.)
Sangam/
–2– A.B.A. No. 4461 of 2025