Rajasthan High Court – Jaipur
Bhanwar Singh S/O Abhay Singh vs State Of Rajasthan … on 18 August, 2025
Bench: Inderjeet Singh, Bhuwan Goyal
[2025:RJ-JP:32123-DB]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 680/2025
Bhanwar Singh S/o Abhay Singh, Aged About 47 Years, R/o
Jhjheu, Bikaner, Rajasthan.
----Appellant
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, School
Education Department, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur
2. The Director, Elementary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner
3. The Director, Directorate Of Literacy And Continuing
Education, Shiksha Sankul, Jln Marg, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
4. The District Literacy And Continuing Education Officer,
Jaipur.
5. The District Collector And Chairman, District Redressal
Committee (Literacy), Jaipur.
6. The District Literacy And Continuing Education Officer,
Bikaner.
7. The District Collector And Chairman, District Redressal
Committee (Literacy), Bikaner.
8. The District Literacy And Continuing Education Officer,
Sriganganagar.
9. The District Collector And Chairman, District Redressal
Committee (Literacy), Sriganganagar.
10. Prabhu Dayal S/o Sohan Lal, Aged About 34 Years, R/o
Phalanwali, Tehsil Pugal, District Bikaner, Rajasthan.
11. Yogesh Kumar S/o Ramesh Kumar, Aged About 34 Years,
R/o Ward No. 1, Rcp Colony, 2 Mld-A, Gharsana,
Sriganganagar, Rajasthan.
12. Ramswaroop Choudhary S/o Keshar Lal Choudhary, Aged
About 45 Years, R/o Village Jhopadiya, Post Bhankrota,
Tehsil Madhorajpura, District Jaipur, Rajasthan.
----Respondents
For Appellant(s) : Mr. Shovit Jhajharia
For Respondent(s) :
(Downloaded on 20/08/2025 at 04:15:40 PM)
[2025:RJ-JP:32123-DB] (2 of 2) [SAW-680/2025]
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYALOrder
18/08/2025
1. Heard.
2. Submission of learned counsel for the appellant is that the
order of the Court directing the respondents to initiate
departmental enquiry is a very harsh order and the affidavit of
stenographer has not been taken into consideration.
3. Writ petition was filed which was duly signed by the counsel
along with affidavit. Therefore, submission that it was
inadvertently made, cannot be accepted. However, whether act of
the appellant is one which warrants imposition of minor penalty or
major penalty would be an issue for consideration by the
concerned authority. The appellant would be at liberty to submit
before the concerned authority that present is not a case for
major penalty but only for minor penalty.
4. Appeal is, accordingly, dismissed.
5. Pending application, if any, also stands dismissed.
(BHUWAN GOYAL),J (INDERJEET SINGH),J
Sudeepak/64
(Downloaded on 20/08/2025 at 04:15:40 PM)
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)