Supreme Court – Daily Orders
Paras Ahirwar vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 20 August, 2025
Author: J.K. Maheshwari
Bench: J.K. Maheshwari
ITEM NO.7 COURT NO.2 SECTION II-E
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 9314/2025
[Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 05-07-2024
in MCRC No. 22475/2024 passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh
Principal Seat at Jabalpur]
PARAS AHIRWAR Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH Respondent(s)
(IA No. 142167/2025 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.)
Date : 20-08-2025 This matter was called on for hearing today.
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.K. MAHESHWARI
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAY BISHNOI
For Petitioner(s) :Ms. Minakshi Vij, AOR
Mr. Alok Bhatt, Adv.
For Respondent(s) : Ms. Mrinal Gopal Elker, AOR
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
O R D E R
1. Against an order rejecting the regular bail by
the High Court and to seek bail, the present special
leave petition has been filed. The petitioner is in
custody w.e.f. 28.12.2023 in connection with FIR
Signature Not Verified No.363 dated 23.12.2023 for the offences punishable
Digitally signed by
Gulshan Kumar Arora
Date: 2025.08.20
16:51:53 IST
Reason:
1
SLP (Crl) No.9314/2025
under Sections 201, 344, 376(2)(n), 376(2)(h), 506
and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 registered with
Police Station Nazirabad, District Bhopal Dehat,
Madhya Pradesh.
2. Having considered the submissions as made
before us and the role as assigned to the petitioner
whereby he was only driving the vehicle and no
allegation of commission of rape has been alleged
against him, however, looking to the period of
incarceration, without expressing any opinion on the
merits of the case, we are inclined to release the
petitioner on bail.
3. Accordingly, we direct that the petitioner be
released on bail on furnishing the suitable bail
bonds and sureties and on such other terms and
conditions as may be deemed fit by the trial Court.
4. Petitioner to abide all the conditions as
imposed and shall regularly attend the trial until
exempted by the Court. Violation, if any, may give a
cause to take recourse as permissible and the trial
Court is at liberty to do the needful.
2
SLP (Crl) No.9314/2025
5. Accordingly and in view of the foregoing, the
special leave petition stands allowed.
6. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand
disposed of.
(GULSHAN KUMAR ARORA) (NAND KISHOR)
AR-CUM-PS ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
3
SLP (Crl) No.9314/2025