Vimal vs State Of U.P. Thru. Second Addl. … on 18 August, 2025

0
3


1. Taking note of the facts stated in the affidavit filed in support the application (C.M. application No. 2 of 2025) seeking condonation of delay, which has not been opposed, the application is allowed.

2. Delay in filing the revision appeal is hereby condoned.

3. Shri Prashant Srivastava, Advocate has put in appearance on behalf of opposite party no. 2 in Court today and has filed Vakalatnama which is taken on record.

4. The opposite party no. 2 is present before this Court who has been identified by her counsel Shri Prashant Srivastava.

5. Heard

6. By means of the present revision, the revisionist has assailed the order dated 03.12.2024 passed by Second Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Hardoi (in short “Family Court’) in Criminal Misc. Case no. 409/2022 (Smt. Rinki and Ors. Vs. Vimal).



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here