Manipur High Court
Chabungbam Rajmani Singh vs Smt. Thokchom (O) Jeclean Devi on 22 August, 2025
SHAMURAILATPAM SUSHIL Digitally signed by SHAMURAILATPAM
SUSHIL SHARMA
SHARMA Date: 2025.08.22 17:01:01 +05'30'
Sl. No. 19
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR
AT IMPHAL
CRP(CRP Art. 227) No. 1 of 2023
Chabungbam Rajmani Singh
Petitioner
Vs.
Smt. Thokchom (O) Jeclean Devi
Respondent
BEFORE
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. KEMPAIAH SOMASHEKAR
ORDER
22.08.2025
Mr. Dayali Elangbam, learned counsel for the petitioner is
present. Similarly, Mr. Th. Mahira, learned counsel for the respondent is also
present.
Whereas, in this CRP proceeding seeking for setting aside of
the impugned order dated 18.11.2022. The respondent herein being the
plaintiff who has initiated the proceeding against the defendant who is the
petitioner in this matter. The suit is initiated on the premises of the
document relating to the promissory note as there was some receiving an
amount of Rs. 3,25,000/- (Rupees Three Lakhs twenty-five thousand) which
is indicating in the aforesaid promissory note/document which was entered
in between the parties.
However, the learned counsel for the petitioner in this matter
facilitated the judgment rendered by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India
reported in (2015) 10 SCC 521 in the case of State Bank Of Hyderabad
vs Rabo Bank. In this judgment, the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India had
addressed the issues of Order 37 Rule 3 of CPC in respect of the summary
suit, leave to defend, principles summarized, triable issue as to meaning or
Page | 1
correctness of the documents pertaining to claim and same has been
addressed in issues in detail and also specifically stated at paragraph Nos.
15 to 24.
In the meanwhile of recording the submission made by the
learned counsel for the petitioner in this matter and also keeping in view
the provision of Order 10 of CPC and Section 89 of CPC, it is deemed
appropriate that this matter be referred to the Mediation Centre of the High
Court of Manipur to explore the possibility of amicable settlement.
Accordingly, it is referred and also be scheduled on
02.09.2025.
The petitioner and also the respondents are directed to be
present physically before the Mediation Centre to explore the possibility of
amicable settlement on the aforesaid date at 01:30 pm.
Accordingly, made an observation.
The Registry be directed to forward the relevant materials to
the Mediation Centre for the purpose of reference.
However, the learned counsel for the petitioner in this matter
submitting that the interim order is in force and therefore, it is said that if
any interim order is force, the same shall be extended until the further
orders.
CHIEF JUSTICE
Sushil
Page | 2