Papita vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jd:37763) on 22 August, 2025

0
3


Rajasthan High Court – Jodhpur

Papita vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jd:37763) on 22 August, 2025

[2025:RJ-JD:37763]

      HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                       JODHPUR
                 S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 2477/2025

1.       Papita D/o Shri Sakriya, Aged About 20 Years, Resident
         Of Village Juni Boradi, Naharpura Chhota, Meghnagar,
         Jhabua,       Madhyapradesh.              At      Present     Deedwana-
         Kuchaman, Rajasthan. Nawa, Dist. Deedwana-Kuchaman,
         Rajasthan.
2.       Mahendra Yadav S/o Shri Kalyanmal Yadav, Aged About
         25 Years, Resident Of Lakshmipura, Jaipur, At Present
         Dist.     Deedwana-Kuchaman,                 Rajasthan.     Nawa,     Dist.
         Deedwana-Kuchaman, Rajasthan.
                                                                     ----Petitioners
                                      Versus
1.       State Of Rajasthan, Through Chief Secretary. Department
         Of Home Affairs, Jaipur.
2.       Inspector General Of Police, Ajmer Range, Ajmer
3.       Superintendent Of Police, Deedwaana-Kuchaman
4.       Station House Officer, Police Station Maroth, District
         Deedwana-Kuchaman, Rajasthan.
5.       Station     House       Officer,    Police     Station    Thandla,    Dist.
         Jhabua, M.p.
6.       Manish S/o Shree Sakriya, Resident Of Village Juni
         Boradi,      Naharpura             Chhota,       Meghnagar,       Jhabua,
         Madhyapradesh.
7.       Sakriya S/o Unknown, Resident Of Village Juni Boradi,
         Naharpura Chhota. Jhabua, Madhyapradesh Meghnagar,
8.       Buddhi Devi W/o Shree Sakriya, Resident Of Village Juni
         Boradi,      Naharpura             Chhota,       Meghnagar,       Jhabua,
         Madhyapradesh.
                                                                   ----Respondents


For Petitioner(s)            :     Mr. Gulab Singh
For Respondent(s)            :     Mr. Narendra Singh Chandawat, Public
                                   Prosecutor




                       (Downloaded on 25/08/2025 at 09:40:59 PM)
 [2025:RJ-JD:37763]                   (2 of 3)                    [CRLW-2477/2025]


          HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MUKESH RAJPUROHIT

Order

22/08/2025

1. Learned counsel for the petitioners does not want to pursue

the petition against the respondent No.5 and prayed that the

respondent No.5 be deleted from the array of respondents at the

peril and risk of the petitioners.

2. Accordingly, the respondent No.5 is deleted from the array of

respondents.

3. The petitioners have preferred this writ petition under

Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of

necessary directions to the official respondents to provide

adequate security and protection to the petitioners on the ground

that they are facing grave threat of life and liberty at the hands of

private respondent Nos.6 to 8.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that Article 21 of

the Constitution of India provides for right to life, limb and

personal liberty under the ambit of fundamental rights and any

threat to the same amounts to violation of the same. Being the

citizens of independent India, the petitioners have right to reside

with honour and dignity. Therefore, they have sought the

protection from the hands of private respondents and they also

sought direction to respondents to provide them protection.

5. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and perusing

the record of the case, this Court is neither going into the niceties

of the matter nor proving the relationship between the petitioners,

(Downloaded on 25/08/2025 at 09:40:59 PM)
[2025:RJ-JD:37763] (3 of 3) [CRLW-2477/2025]

as it is the subject matter of investigation before the Investigating

Officer, and is concerned only about the protection of life, limb and

liberty as guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution of India.

6. Since the petitioners apprehend threat to their right of life

and liberty, this Court is of the considered view that the

petitioners have every right to seek the protection of their life,

limb and liberty.

7. In this view of the matter, the instant criminal writ petition is

disposed of with the direction to the petitioners to appear before

the concerned Superintendent of Police along with appropriate

representation regarding their grievance. The concerned

Superintendent of Police shall in turn hear the grievance of the

petitioners, and after analyzing the threat perceptions, if

necessitated, may pass necessary orders to provide adequate

security and protection to the petitioners.

8. It is made clear that any observation in this order shall not

affect any criminal and civil proceedings initiated against the

petitioners.

9. Stay petition also stands disposed of.

(MUKESH RAJPUROHIT),J
310-Ramesh/-

(Downloaded on 25/08/2025 at 09:40:59 PM)

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here