Patna High Court – Orders
Nasrin Parveen @ Nasrin Khatoon @ Nasri … vs The State Of Bihar on 22 August, 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.49796 of 2025
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-39 Year-2025 Thana- Lokha District- Supaul
======================================================
1. Nasrin Parveen @ Nasrin Khatoon @ Nasri Khatoon @ Nasirin Prakhan
Wife of Abdul Barik @ Abdul Bari R/O Gangapatti, P.S.- Laukaha, District-
Supaul
2. Bahisa Khatun wife of Mohammad Saddam @ Md. Saddam R/O
Gangapatti, P.S.- Laukaha, District- Supaul
3. Bibi Kulsum @ Kulsum Khatoon wife of Md. Kadir R/O Gangapatti, P.S.-
Laukaha, District- Supaul
4. Bibi Samsa Khatoon @ Shamsa Khatoon wife of Mohammad Aiyub @Md.
Aiyug @ Md. Aiyub, R/O Gangapatti, P.S.- Laukaha, District- Supaul
5. Bibi Samina @ Samina Khatoon wife of Md. Mannan @ Mukhiya R/O
Gangapatti, P.S.- Laukaha, District- Supaul
6. Afsana Khatoon wife of Mohammad Mustak R/O Gangapatti, P.S.- Laukaha,
District- Supaul
7. Bibi Amarun Khatoon @ Amriyun Khatoon wife of Md. Mahzum @Md.
Mejum R/O Gangapatti, P.S.- Laukaha, District- Supaul
8. Samsa Khatoon wife of Faiz Mohammad R/O Gangapatti, P.S.- Laukaha,
District- Supaul
9. Bibi Johra @ Madhura Wali wife of Md. Alishar R/O Gangapatti, P.S.-
Laukaha, District- Supaul
10. Bibi Begam Khatoon @ Begam Khatoon @ Bibi Begam wife of Md.
Mustak R/O Gangapatti, P.S.- Laukaha, District- Supaul
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Krishna Prasad Singh, Sr. Advocate
Mr. Zeyane Hoda, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Nand Kishore Prasad, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOURENDRA PANDEY
ORAL ORDER
2 22-08-2025
Heard Mr. Krishna Prasad Singh, the learned Senior
counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.49796 of 2025(2) dt.22-08-2025
2/4
2. Petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection
with Laukaha P.S. Case No. 39 of 2025 registered for the
offences under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 126(2), 127(2), 115(2),
121(2), 132, 109, 303(2), 324 (4), 352 and 351(2) of the I.P.C.
3. As per the prosecution case, the informant has
alleged that during a protest over Md. Jahangir’s death, a violent
mob of villagers, who were incited by said incident, attacked the
police personnel and even vandalized the police vehicle. It is
further alleged that the attackers were around 200-250 persons,
out of which 57 persons were named, including the petitioners.
4. Learned Senior counsel for the petitioners submits
that the petitioners are innocent and all female accused persons.
It is further submitted that there are no specific allegations
levelled against the petitioners. It is next submitted that at best
the petitioners could be saddled with the allegations of being
members of the mob and apparently no police personnel
sustained any injury in the said occurrence. All the petitioners
have clean antecedents. It has lastly been submitted that ten
named accused persons have already been granted bail by a
learned Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated
11.08.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 56649 of 2025.
5. Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.49796 of 2025(2) dt.22-08-2025
3/4
for anticipatory bail.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case
and the submissions advanced on behalf of the parties, let the
petitioners above named be released on anticipatory bail, in the
event of arrest or surrender before the learned Court below
within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail
bonds of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the
like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below
where the case is pending/successor court in connection with
Laukaha P.S. Case No. 39 of 2025, subject to the conditions as
laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal
Procedure read with corresponding Section 482(2) of B.N.S.S.
as well as subject to the following conditions:-
(i) One of the bailors of the petitioners shall be
their close relative.
(ii) The petitioners shall remain physically present
in Court on each date of the trial.
(iii) In case of absence on two consecutive dates, or
in violation of the terms of the bail, the bail bond of
the petitioners will be liable to be cancelled by the
Court concerned.
(iv) If the petitioners are found involved in similar
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.49796 of 2025(2) dt.22-08-2025
4/4nature of offence in future, the prosecution shall be
at liberty to move for cancellation of their bail
bond.
(v) The learned Court below shall verify the
criminal antecedent of the petitioners and in case at
any stage it is found that the petitioners has
concealed their criminal antecedent, the court
below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond
of the petitioners. However, the acceptance of bail
bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall
not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of
verification.
7. Accordingly, the prayer for bail is allowed.
(Sourendra Pandey, J)
manoj/-
U T