Kaluram vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jd:37869) on 22 August, 2025

0
15

[ad_1]

Order

22/08/2025

1. It is stated at the Bar that a compromise has been arrived at

between the parties and it is borne out from the compromise that

the complainant is not inclined to proceed further in the matter.

2. Learned counsel for the parties have placed reliance on a

decision of Supreme Court in case of Gian Singh V/s. State of

Punjab & Anr. [(2012) 10 SCC 303].

3. It is also submitted that upon the aforementioned

compromise, the learned Court below vide order dated

[2025:RJ-JD:37869] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-4722/2025]

23.04.2025, has verified the compromise between the parties to

the extent of the offences under Sections 341, 323, & 504 of IPC

and has discharged the petitioners for the offences under Sections

341, 323, & 504 of IPC. However, the learned court below has

declined to verify the compromise with regard to the offences

under Sections 148, 354 & 149 of IPC on the ground that the said

offence is non-compoundable.

[ad_2]

Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here