Shambhu Kumar vs The State Of Bihar on 27 August, 2025

0
14

1. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant and

learned Special P.P. Mr. Binay Krishna.

2. The learned counsel for the appellant submits that

from perusal of the office report dated 28.03.2025, it would

manifest that the same records that respondent no.2 after taking

the notice declined to put her signature.

3. In view of the office report dated 28.03.2025, the

notice is deemed to have been validly served.

4. Heard learned counsel for the appellant and the

learned Special P.P. Mr. Binay Krishna.

[ad_1]

Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here