M/S.Bombay Colour Agency. vs State Of Telangana, on 20 August, 2025

0
10

[ad_1]

Since the issue involved in all these criminal petitions

are one and the same, they are being heard together and being

disposed of by way of this common order.

2. These Criminal Petitions are filed seeking to set aside

the order dated 19.11.2024 passed in Crl.M.P.Nos.30, 33, 28

and 32 of 2023 in C.C.Nos.204885, 204894, 205248 and

204895 of 2018, respectively, by the learned XVI Additional

Judge-cum-XX Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, City Civil

Court, Secunderabad.

3. The brief facts of the cases are that the

petitioner/complainant in all the cases had filed petitions,

respectively, under Section 319 Cr.P.C. seeking to include Mr.

Arun Kumar Agarwal, Executive Director of the accused

company, as accused No.3 in the original complaint filed

under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, stating

that though notices were issued to both the Managing Director

SKS,J
Crl.P.No.4595 of 2025 and batch

and Executive Director before filing the complaint, they were

not made parties in their personal capacities, and that since

the Executive Director had signed the cheque on behalf of the

company, he was a necessary party for adjudication.

[ad_2]

Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here