Shanti Ranjan Paul vs Indrani Ray Alias Indrani Chakraborty on 26 August, 2025

0
7

[ad_1]

1. This is an application for appointment of an arbitrator under Clause 16 of the

Memorandum of Agreement dated November 16, 2012.

2. The dispute arises out of the agreement to sell the property to the petitioner.

The petitioner contends that time was never of the essence. The first clause

provided that the transaction would be complete only after mutation of the

premises in favour of the respondent and after sanction of a revised building

plan by the Bidhannagar Municipal Corporation. By the said agreement, the

petitioner had agreed to acquire the entire unfinished constructed building

over the leasehold land under the terms and conditions specified in the said

agreement.

[ad_2]

Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here