A.S.Lakshmi Narasimha Bharani, vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh, on 31 July, 2025

0
8

Andhra Pradesh High Court – Amravati

A.S.Lakshmi Narasimha Bharani, vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh, on 31 July, 2025

       IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI                                          f-

                    (SPECIAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION)
               THURSDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF JULY                                       I,                 t       c-*                      MC'
                      TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE                          i
                                                                            V                                      »    '    ..1.   ^


                                   ■.PRESENT:                                                    \
                                                                                                      'X
                                                                                ''•K                               .->h
               THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N                                   H:                                    w.
                                                                                                               Afr
                    WRIT PETITION NO: 12051 OF 2025
                                                                                                           -




Between:

  1. A.S.Lakshmi Narasimha Bharani,, S/o. Late A S S R Sarma, Aged 63

     years, D.No.7-4-20, Amanchi vari Veedhi, Anakapalle Visakhapatnam.
  2. S. Satya Nageswar rao,, S/o. Late A S S R Sarma, Aged 52 years,
     D.No.7-4-20, Arnanchi vari Veedhi, Anakapalle, Visakhapatnam.
  3. S. Viswanadha Mani„ S/o. Late A S S R Sarma, Aged 49 years,
     H.No.134, Milan Village, near Siddhi Vinayaka College Simili pada,
     Angul, Odisha State.
  4. A.S. Phani,, S/o. Late A S S R Sarma, Aged 48 years, H.No.2-1/1/202                                                                j




     Srinivasam Apartments Chandia Nagar, Hyderabad, Telanagana.
  5. A.A.N Padmavathi,, D/o. Late A S S R Sarma, W/o. Satyanarayana                                                                     j




     aged about 60 years, D.No.7-4-20, Amanchi Street, Anakapalle                                                                       1




     Visakhapatnam.
  6. Veduala Venkata Ratna Rohini,, D/o. Late A S S R Sarma, aged about
     61 years, D.No.7-4-20, Amanchi Street, Anakapalle, Visakhapatnam.
     (Rep by its GPA Holder Sri D V Mahesh S/o Sanyasi Naidu Aged 54
     years,     R/o.D.No.     37-12-71/6     Murali        Nagar,   N   G       Os                    Colony                                1




     Visakhapatnam.)
                                                                                            Petitioner

                                       AND

   1. The     State   of Andhra    Pradesh   j j   Rep. by its Principal Secretary
     Municipal        Administration   and         Urban     Development               Department
     Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District.
   2. The Visakhapatnam Metropolitan Regional Development Authority,
     Rep. by its Commissioner. Visakhapatnam.
    3. The      Greater Visakhapatnam       Municipal         Corporation,    Rep    by    its
      Commissioner, Visakhapatnam.
   4. M/s. Hindustan Shipyard Staff Cooperative Building Society Limited,
      Rep. by its President, Bada ChinniKrishna, S/o. Late Narayana, aged
      about 78 years, R/o.D.No.39-24-10, Narasimha Nagar, Near Raiwada
      Water Tank, Madhavadhara, Visakhapatnam.
   5. Mythri     Nagar   Association     Rep   by      its     Secretary,    Sri.   Reddy
      Venkateswara Rao, S/o. Krishna Murthy H.No.MIG 42, Sector-1, MVP
      Colony, Visakhapatnam.
   6. The Anti-Corruption Bureau,, Represented by the Director General of
      Police Vijayawada, Andhra Pradesh
                                                                            Respondents
      Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in thp
circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be
pleased to issue any Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the
nature of Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records pertaining proceedings
Rc.No.11025(37)/257/2023 e-2255673 dated 04.12.2024 (impugned Order)
issued by the 2nd Respondent and to quash the same as illegal, arbitrary,
perverse, mala-fide, misconception. Capricious, passed with Non application
of mind and in contravention           of the provisions of the             Urban    Areas

Development Act, 1975 and subsequent Andhra Pradesh Metropolitan Region
and Development Authorities Act, 2016, Andhra Pradesh (Andhra Area) Inams
(Abolition and Conversion into Ryotwari) Act,                  1956,   A.P.Survey        and
boundaries Act, 1923, as well as the order dated 29.08.2024 of the High Court
in WP.No. 10303 of 2024 apart from being violative of the fundamental and
constitutional right guaranteed to me under Article 14, 19, 21 and 300A of the
Constitution of India and Consequently direct the 1®^ Respondent, to conduct
a detailed enquiry based on the show cause notice issued                     in   Rc.No.11

025(37)/257/2023 e-2255673 dated 01-07-2024.
 iA NO: 3 OF 2025

      Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances
stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be
pleased to direct the Respondents Nos 2 and 3 not to accord building
permissions in L.P.No.30/94 and L.P.No.1/2004 in Sy.Nos.          164/1   164/1A.

164/2, 166, 168 of Vepagunta Village Pendurthy Mandal, visakhapatnam
District, pending determination of the Writ Petition and pass. Pending disposal
ofWP 12051 of 2025, on the file of the High Court.
IA NO: 2 OF 2025

      Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances
stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be
pleased to suspend the operation of proceedings Rc.No.11025(37)/ 257/2023
                                              nd
e-2255673 dated 04.12.2024 issued by the 2          respondent. Pending disposal
of WP 12051 of 2025, on the file of the High Court.
      The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the
affidavit filed in support thereof and the earlier order of the High Court
dated: 17.07.2025 made herein and upon hearing the arguments of Sri
THATHIREDDY ASHOK SRIVASTAVA Advocate for the Petitioners and of

GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN URBAN DEV                     for the Respondent No.1,   Sri

GANESH BABU S, Standing Counsel for Respondent No.2, Sri A S C BOSE,
Standing counsel for Respondent No.3, Sri SRINIVASA RAO BODDULURI,
Advocate for Respondent No.5 and of Sri S.Syam Sunder Rao Standing
Counsel dum-SpI Public Prosecutor for ACB the Court made the following.
ORDER

“Post this matter on 07.08.2025, along with W.P.Nos. 15960 of

2018, 13636 of 2018, 141 of 2019, 40917 of 2022, 10118 of 2023, 10119 of
2023, 28673 of 2025 and 16119 of 2025.

Status quo granted earlier shall stand extended till then.”

Sd/-K.SRINIVASA RAJU
ASSISTANT,/REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,

1. One CC to SRI. THATHIREDDY ASHOK SRIVASTAVA Advocate
[OPUC]

2. Two CCs to GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN URBAN DEV .High Court Of
Andhra Pradesh. [OUT]

3. One CC to Sri. GANESH BABU S, Standing counsel.[OPUC]

4. One CC to Sri. A S C BOSE, Standing counsel.[OPUC]

5. One CC to Sri. SRINIVASA RAO BODDULURI, Advocate [OPUC]

6. One CC to Sri S.Syam Sunder Rao, Standing Counsel Cum-Spl. Public
Prosecutor for ACB.

7. One spare copy

ksr
HIGH COURT

HN,J

DATED:31.07.2025

Post this matter on 07.08.2025, along with W.P.Nos. 15960 of 2018,13636
of 2018,141 of 2019, 40917 of 2022,10118 of 2023, 10119 of 2023, 28673
of 2025 and 16119 of 2025.

ORDER

WP.No.12051 of 2025

INTERIM ORDER EXTENDED
o

s – 6 M)B 2I1S

[ad_1]

Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here