[ad_1]
Patna High Court – Orders
Vijay Kumar @ Vijay Kumar Ray @ Vijay Ray vs The State Of Bihar on 30 August, 2025
Author: Jitendra Kumar
Bench: Jitendra Kumar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.47994 of 2025
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-168 Year-2023 Thana- TAJPUR District- Samastipur
======================================================
Vijay Kumar @ Vijay Kumar Ray @ Vijay Ray, S/o Dinesh Ray, Resident Of
Village- Banveera, Police Station- Tajpur (O.P. Halai), District- Samastipur
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anish Kumar, Advocate
For the State : Ms. Renu Kumari, APP
For the Informant : Mr. Anand Raj, Advocate
Ms. Vandana Kumari, Advocate
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
3 30-08-2025
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Tajpur
(O.P. Halai) P.S. Case No. 168 of 2023 dated 31.03.2023,
registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148,
149, 341, 323, 324, 307, 302, 354B, 506 and 504 of the Indian
Penal Code.
3. Prior to the present petition, the petitioner had
moved this Court earlier for similar relief by filing Cr. Misc. No.
85655 of 2024, which was rejected by this Court vide order
dated 13.12.2024 on account of seriousness of the alleged
offence.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.47994 of 2025(3) dt.30-08-2025
2/2
more than eight months have passed since the last order when
the previous bail petition of the petitioner was rejected. He
further submits that trial is not yet concluded. However, as per
the report received from the learned Trial Court, it transpires
that out of eight charge-sheet witnesses, four have already been
examined.
5. However, learned APP for the State vehemently
opposes the prayer of the petitioner for bail.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances,
and serious nature of the allegation, I am not persuaded to
enlarge the petitioner on bail at this stage.
7. The petition is dismissed accordingly.
8. However, learned Trial Court is directed to
conclude the Trial preferably within a period of six months and
in case the Trial is not concluded within the stipulated time, the
petitioner will have liberty to renew his prayer for bail.
(Jitendra Kumar, J)
shoaib/-
U T
[ad_2]
Source link