Uttarakhand High Court
Jabir Mian vs State Of Uttarakhand on 6 January, 2025
Author: Ravindra Maithani
Bench: Ravindra Maithani
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Anticipatory Bail Application No. 906 of 2024
Jabir Mian ........Applicant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand ........Respondent
Present:-
Mr. Mahavir Kohli, Advocate for the applicant.
Mr. Pramod Tiwari, Brief Holder for the State.
Hon'ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral)
The applicant seeks anticipatory bail in
FIR/Case Crime No.93 of 2022, dated 31.01.2022, under
Sections 420, 406, 120-B IPC along with Sections 3/21 of
The Banning of Unregulated Deposit Schemes Act, 2019,
Sections 4/5 of the Chit Funds Act, 1982 and Section 3 of
The Uttarakhand Protection of Interest of Depositors (in
Financial Establishments) Act, 2005, Police Station Patel
Nagar, District Dehradun.
2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and
perused the record.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant would
submit that the co-accused Rajendra Singh Bisht, having
similar role has already been granted regular bail in the
instant case; he was the main accused.
2
4. Learned State counsel admits these facts. It
makes out the case for anticipatory bail.
5. Having considered, this Court is of the view
that this is a case, in which, the applicant should be
granted anticipatory bail. The instant anticipatory bail
application deserves to be allowed.
6. The anticipatory bail application is allowed.
7. In the eventuality of arrest, the applicant shall
be enlarged on bail on his furnishing a personal bond
with two sureties, each in the like amount, to the
satisfaction of the Arresting Officer (“the AO”) concerned.
In addition to it, the applicant shall also comply with the
following conditions:-
(i) The applicant shall not approach any witness
in any manner, whatsoever.
(ii) He shall cooperate with the investigation.
(iii) The applicant shall not leave the country
without prior permission of the concerned
court.
(iv) The applicant shall deposit his passport with
the AO. The passport may only be returned by
the order of the court concerned. If the
3applicant does not have passport, he shall give
an undertaking to that effect to the AO.
(v) The applicant shall also give an undertaking on
(i), (ii) & (iii) above.
(Ravindra Maithani, J.)
06.01.2025
Sanjay
Digitally signed by SANJAY KANOJIA
DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND,
SANJAY KANOJIA 2.5.4.20=e50e50b49596520698eff87e0a08bbd504686df4d1afc60f54a287831dec46f
e, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND,
serialNumber=26EEB7122ED0DD23233A255DD8EC450A84B515A087CAEFD1B3179
A7DEAE40699, cn=SANJAY KANOJIA
Date: 2025.01.06 18:31:11 +05’30’
[ad_1]
Source link