Kejriwal Castings Limited vs Enviro Serene on 7 January, 2025

0
45

Calcutta High Court

Kejriwal Castings Limited vs Enviro Serene on 7 January, 2025

Author: Shampa Sarkar

Bench: Shampa Sarkar

OC 46

                             ORDER SHEET
                              AP/450/2023
                    IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
                  ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
                         COMMERCIAL DIVISION

                         KEJRIWAL CASTINGS LIMITED
                                    VS
                              ENVIRO SERENE

  BEFORE:
  The Hon'ble JUSTICE SHAMPA SARKAR
  Date: 7th January, 2025.



                                                                      Appearance:
                                                            Mr. Sanjay Baid, Adv.
                                                            Mr. Sourav Dutta, Adv.
                                                                ...for the petitioner

      The Court: The Court found that despite service on two occasions, the

respondent did not appear. Thus, the Court directed service by way of paper

publication. None appears even today.

Affidavit of service filed in Court indicates that paper publications have

been made in two widely circulated dailies, namely, ‘The Telegraph’ and

‘Anandabazar Patrika’. Under such circumstances, the matter is taken up in the

absence of the respondent.

AP/450/2023 was filed under Section 29A of the Arbitration and

Conciliation Act, 1996, by the applicant seeking extension of the mandate of the

learned Arbitrator. A coordinate Bench by an order dated 30th August, 2023

rejected the said application on the ground that the application had been filed

after the mandate of the learned Arbitrator had expired. The petitioner preferred

an appeal before the Hon’ble Apex Court. The appeal was registered as Civil
2

Appeal No.10622/2024. The Hon’ble Apex Court allowed the appeal in part, but

did not extend the mandate of the learned Arbitrator thereby leaving it to the

Court to appoint a new Arbitrator in this regard. The matter was remitted to the

High Court for necessary orders.

Mr. Dutta learned advocate for the petitioner submits that this Court

should appoint a substitute Arbitrator in terms of Section 29A(6) of the

Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 as directed Hon’ble Apex Court.

Accordingly, the Court appoints Ms. Hashnuhana Chakraborty, learned

Advocate (Mob. No.9830111269), as the Arbitrator, to arbitrate the dispute. This

order is subject to compliance of Section 12 of the Arbitration and Conciliation

Act, 1996.

The learned Arbitrator shall fix her own remuneration as per the Schedule

of the Act.

The claimant will be at liberty to pray before the erstwhile learned

Arbitrator Mr. Samar Roy, a retired District Judge, for handing over all the

documents, pleadings etc.

The learned substitute Arbitrator shall proceed from the stage prior to filing

of this application. It appears that the matter had proceeded ex parte before the

learned Arbitrator. This order be communicated to the respondent by the

petitioner or the learned Advocate on record for the petitioner.

AP/450/2023 is, accordingly, disposed of.

(SHAMPA SARKAR, J.)

B.Pal



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here