Supreme Court – Daily Orders
Delhi Development Authority vs Veena Mahajan on 11 December, 2024
Bench: Surya Kant, Dipankar Datta
1
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION ………..D.NO.5463/2023
IN
D. No. 10069/2021
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY APPELLANT
VERSUS
VEENA MAHAJAN RESPONDENT
WITH
MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION ………..D.NO.12592/2023
IN
D. No.10856/2022
MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION ………..D.NO.14854/2023
IN
D. No.27819/2020
D. No.31968/2023
D. No.13254/2023 in D.No.20588/2019
D. No.14289/2023
in
C.A.No.8493/2016
D.No.20490/2023
IN
C.A.No.8564/2016
D.No.39310/2022
IN
C.A.No.8526/2016
D.No.6510/2023
IN
D.No.29149/2023
D.No.10561/2023
Signature Not Verified
IN
D.No.14138/2022
Digitally signed by
ARJUN BISHT
Date: 2025.01.10
17:17:51 IST
Reason:
D.No.22699/2023
IN
C.A.12249/2023
2
D.No.31028/2023
IN
C.A.8555/2023
D.No.37258/2023
IN
C.A.8632/2016
O R D E R
1. Delay condoned, and leave granted.
2. The applications for substitution are allowed, subject to all
just exceptions.
3. Learned senior counsel for the parties are ad idem that the
issue involved in the instant case squarely falls within the ambit
of our decision in Government of NCT of Delhi through its
Secretary, Land and Building Department & another vs. K.L. Rathi
Steels Limited and others, (2024) 7 SCC 315.
4. Consequently, the respondents-land owners shall be entitled to
compensation under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency
in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 in
accordance with the procedure as explained in paragraph 128 of K.L.
Rathi (supra), which reads as follows:
128. Under the circumstances, dismissal of the
RPs and miscellaneous applications would have
been logical and we could have ended our judgment
here by ordering so. However, there is something
more of a balancing act that needs to be done
having regard to the disclosures that were made
in course of progress of other proceedings before
us, which followed immediately after judgment on
this set of RPs and miscellaneous applications
was reserved. Such other proceedings arose out of
appeals carried from orders of the High Court
declaring land acquisition proceedings as lapsed
based on the decision in Pune Municipal
Corporation (supra) as distinguished from RPs and
miscellaneous applications of the nature under
consideration. Since all such proceedings have
3more or less a common genesis and have followed
similar trajectory, it would be eminently
desirable to find a solution that benefits all.
We may hasten to add here that the exercise of
inherent powers conferred on this Court by
Article 142, in such circumstances, is not just
inevitable but also pivotal for disposal of the
matters at hand, given their impact on public
interest at large as well as to secure uniformity
and consistency in our decisions; hence, we
consider it expedient to pass such orders or
directions for ensuring complete justice in the
matters under consideration before us.
Notwithstanding our discussion on the reference
which was necessitated to answer the question of
law on which there was a disagreement between the
Hon’ble Judges of the Division Bench, taking an
overall and holistic view of the matter and in
the light of the larger public interest that is
involved, in each of the RPs and miscellaneous
applications that have been dealt with by this
judgment (except those remanded to the High Court
and those de-tagged for separate listing infra),
we issue the following directions:
a) The time limit for initiation of fresh
acquisition proceedings in terms of the
provisions contained in section 24(2) of the
2013 Act is extended by a year starting from
01st August, 2024 whereupon compensation to
the affected landowners may be paid in
accordance with law, failing which
consequences, also as per law, shall follow;
b) The parties shall maintain status quo
regarding possession, change of land use and
creation of third-party rights till fresh
acquisition proceedings, as directed above,
are completed;
c) Since the landowners are not primarily
dependent upon the subject lands as their
source of sustenance and most of these lands
were/are under use for other than
agricultural purposes, we deem it appropriate
to invoke our powers under Article 142 of the
Constitution and dispense with the compliance
of Chapters II and III of the 2013 Act
whereunder it is essential to prepare a
Social Impact Assessment Study Report and/or
to develop alternative multi-crop irrigated
agricultural land. We do so to ensure that
the timeline of one year extended at (a)
above to complete the acquisition process can
4be adhered to by the appellants and the
GNCTD, which would also likely be beneficial
to the expropriated landowners;
d) Similarly, compliance with sections 13, 14,
16 to 20 of the 2013 Act can be dispensed
with as the subject-lands are predominantly
urban/semi-urban in nature and had earlier
been acquired for public purposes of
paramount importance. In order to simplify
the compliance of direction at (a) above, it
is further directed that every Notification
issued under section 4(1) of the 1894 Act in
this batch of cases, shall be treated as a
Preliminary Notification within the meaning
of section 11 of the 2013 Act, and shall be
deemed to have been published as on 01st
January, 2014;
e) The Collector shall provide hearing of
objections as per section 15 of the 2013 Act
without insisting for any Social Impact
Assessment Report and shall, thereafter,
proceed to take necessary steps as per the
procedure contemplated under section 21
onwards of Chapter-IV of 2013 Act, save and
except where compliance of any provision has
been expressly or impliedly dispensed with;
f) The landowners may submit their objections
within a period of four weeks from the date
of pronouncement of this order. Such
objections shall not question the legality of
the acquisition process and shall be limited
only to clauses (a) and (b) of section 15(1)
of the 2013 Act;
g) The Collector shall publish a public notice
on his website and in one English and one
vernacular newspapers, within two weeks of
expiry of the period of four weeks granted
under direction (f) above;
h) The Collector shall, thereafter, pass an
award as early as possible but not exceeding
six months, regardless of the maximum period
of twelve months contemplated under section
25 of the 2013 Act. The market value of the
land shall be assessed as on 01st January,
2014 and the compensation shall be awarded
along with all other monetary benefits in
accordance with the provisions of the 2013
Act except the claim like rehabilitation
etc.;
i) The Collector shall consider all the
parameters prescribed under section 28 of the
2013 Act for determining the compensation for
5
the acquired land. Similarly, the Collector
shall determine the market value of the
building or assets attached with the land in
accordance with section 29 and shall further
award solatium in accordance with section 30
of the 2013 Act;
j) In the peculiar facts and circumstances of
this case, since it is difficult to reverse
the clock back, the compliance of Chapter (V)
pertaining to “Rehabilitation and
Resettlement Award” is hereby dispensed with;
and
k) The expropriated landowners shall be entitled
to seek reference for enhancement of
compensation in accordance with Chapter-VIII
of the 2013 Act.
5. It is clarified that the extension of one year, as granted to
the Authorities for completion of acquisition in sub-para (a)
reproduced above, will commence from the date of this order.
6. The Civil Appeal and Miscellaneous Applications are,
accordingly, disposed of.
7. As a result, pending interlocutory applications, if any, also
stand disposed of.
…………………J.
(SURYA KANT)
…………………J.
(DIPANKAR DATTA)
…………………J.
(UJJAL BHUYAN)
New Delhi;
December 11, 2024
6
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE/INHERENT JURISDICTION
MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. OF 2024
[DIARY NO.10553/2023]
IN
CIVIL APPEAL NO.8519/2016
WITH
CIVIL APPEAL NO.8519/2016
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY APPLICANT
VERSUS
PRITAM SINGH @ PRITAM & ORS. RESPONDENTS
O R D E R
1. Delay condoned.
2. Learned counsel for the parties are ad-idem that, keeping
in view the multiple issues involved, which require fresh
adjudication by the High Court, the instant case may be remanded to
the High Court.
3. Accordingly, the Miscellaneous Application for recalling
of order is allowed, and order dated 31.08.2016 is recalled.
Civil Appeal No. 8519/2016
4. It is clear that this matter falls within the category of
those cases which have been remanded to the High Court as Group E
of the three Judge Bench decision of this Court in Govt. of NCT of
Delhi & Anr. vs. BSK Realtors LLP & Anr., reported in (2024) 7 SCC
370.
5. Accordingly, the Civil Appeals are partly allowed, the
impugned order dated 25.11.2014 is set aside, WP(C)No.6714/2014,
filed before the High Court of Delhi, is restored, and the matter
is remitted to the High Court to determine the dispute in
accordance with law.
6. The parties are, accordingly, directed to appear before
the High Court on 15.01.2025.
7
7. It is clarified that we have not expressed any opinion on
the merits of the case.
8. As a result, the pending interlocutory application, if
any, also stands disposed of.
……………….J.
(SURYA KANT)
……………….J.
(DIPANKAR DATTA)
……………….J.
(UJJAL BHUYAN)
New Delhi;
December 11, 2024
8
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE/INHERENT JURISDICTION
MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. OF 2024
[DIARY NO.12548/2023]
IN
D.No.5670/2022
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY PETITIONER
VERSUS
CHANDER SAIN RESPONDENT
WITH
MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. OF 2024
[DIARY NO.12549/2023]
IN
C.A..No.9600/2016
SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION(C) No.12767/2024
MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. OF 2024
[DIARY NO.39883/2022]
IN
C.A..No.6259/2017
D.No.21946/2023
D.No.18684/2023
D.No.18111/2023
O R D E R
1. Delay condoned.
2. Leave granted.
3. Learned counsel for the parties are ad-idem that, keeping
in view the multiple issues involved, which require fresh
adjudication by the High Court, these cases may be remanded to the
High Court.
4. Accordingly, the Miscellaneous Applications for recalling
of orders, as also RP (C) Diary No.5670/2022, are allowed, and
order dated 31.08.2016 in Civil Appeal No.8638/2016, order dated
9
22.09.2016 in Civil Appeal No.9600/2016, and order dated 04.05.2017
in Civil Appeal No.6259/2017 are recalled.
5. It is clear that all these civil appeals fall within the
category of matters remanded to the High Court in Group E of the
three Judge Bench decision of this Court in Govt. of NCT of Delhi &
Anr. vs. BSK Realtors LLP & Anr., reported in (2024) 7 SCC 370.
6. Accordingly, the civil appeals are partly allowed, the
impugned orders of the High Court are set aside, the respective
writ petitions filed before the High Court of Delhi are restored,
and the matters are remitted to the High Court to determine the
dispute in accordance with law.
6. The parties are, accordingly, directed to appear before
the High Court on 15.01.2025.
7. It is clarified that we have not expressed any opinion on
the merits of the case.
8. As a result, the pending interlocutory applications, if
any, also stands disposed of.
……………….J.
(SURYA KANT)
……………….J.
(DIPANKAR DATTA)
……………….J.
(UJJAL BHUYAN)
New Delhi;
December 11, 2024
10
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE
MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. OF 2024
[DIARY NO.13159/2023]
IN
D. No.18178/2022
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY PETITIONER
VERSUS
DEVINDER SINGH RESPONDENT
O R D E R
1. Delay condoned.
2. Miscellaneous Application Diary No. 13155/2023,
titled `Delhi Development Authority vs. Devinder Singh’
stands dismissed by us vide judgment dated 17.05.2024,
reported as `Delhi Development Authority vs. Tejpal and
Others’, (2024) 7 SCC 433, wherein, as Item 2 in List C.1 of
the judgment, the said Miscellaneous Application filed in
Civil Appeal No. 8663/2016 was dismissed in terms of our
decision in Government of NCT of Delhi through its Secretary,
Land and Building Department & another vs. K.L. Rathi Steels
Limited and others, (2024) 7 SCC 315.
3. In view of the fact that the grounds raised in the
present Miscellaneous Application have already been rejected
by a three-judge bench of this Court and directions have,
accordingly, been issued in terms of paragraph 128 of K.L.
Rathi (supra), the instant Miscellaneous Application is
11
dismissed as having become infructuous.
4. As a result, the pending interlocutory application,
if any, also stands disposed of.
……………….J.
(SURYA KANT)
……………….J.
(DIPANKAR DATTA)
……………….J.
(UJJAL BHUYAN)
New Delhi;
December 11, 2024
12
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION …………….D.NO.13541 OF 2023
IN
C.A. No.8525/2016
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY PETITIONER
VERSUS
GYANWATI & ORS. RESPONDENTS
WITH
M.A…..D.No.38181/2023
IN
C.A.No.8495/2016
O R D E R
1. Delay condoned.
2. It emerges from the facts on record that the subject land was
originally owned by Ram Dev, husband of respondent No.1. It seems
that, with a view to avoid the consequences of the land reforms,
separate family units were constituted and the land was transferred
in the names of three sons of Ram Dev and respondent No.1-Gyanwati.
The sons subsequently sold the very same land to respondent No.1-
Gyanwati, i.e., their mother, through a sale deed dated 15.05.1992.
It further seems that irrespective of whether the sale deed of 1992
is taken into consideration or not, the compensation will be
payable to the family of Ram Dev.
3. In such peculiar facts and circumstances, we hold that
13
respondent No.1-Gyanwati is entitled to compensation under the
Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition,
Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 in accordance with the
procedure as explained in paragraph 128 of K.L. Rathi (supra),
which reads as follows:
128. Under the circumstances, dismissal of the
RPs and miscellaneous applications would have
been logical and we could have ended our judgment
here by ordering so. However, there is something
more of a balancing act that needs to be done
having regard to the disclosures that were made
in course of progress of other proceedings before
us, which followed immediately after judgment on
this set of RPs and miscellaneous applications
was reserved. Such other proceedings arose out of
appeals carried from orders of the High Court
declaring land acquisition proceedings as lapsed
based on the decision in Pune Municipal
Corporation (supra) as distinguished from RPs and
miscellaneous applications of the nature under
consideration. Since all such proceedings have
more or less a common genesis and have followed
similar trajectory, it would be eminently
desirable to find a solution that benefits all.
We may hasten to add here that the exercise of
inherent powers conferred on this Court by
Article 142, in such circumstances, is not just
inevitable but also pivotal for disposal of the
matters at hand, given their impact on public
interest at large as well as to secure uniformity
and consistency in our decisions; hence, we
consider it expedient to pass such orders or
directions for ensuring complete justice in the
matters under consideration before us.
Notwithstanding our discussion on the reference
which was necessitated to answer the question of
law on which there was a disagreement between the
Hon’ble Judges of the Division Bench, taking an
overall and holistic view of the matter and in
the light of the larger public interest that is
involved, in each of the RPs and miscellaneous
applications that have been dealt with by this
judgment (except those remanded to the High Court
and those de-tagged for separate listing infra),
we issue the following directions:
l) The time limit for initiation of fresh
acquisition proceedings in terms of the
14provisions contained in section 24(2) of the
2013 Act is extended by a year starting from
01st August, 2024 whereupon compensation to
the affected landowners may be paid in
accordance with law, failing which
consequences, also as per law, shall follow;
m) The parties shall maintain status quo
regarding possession, change of land use and
creation of third-party rights till fresh
acquisition proceedings, as directed above,
are completed;
n) Since the landowners are not primarily
dependent upon the subject lands as their
source of sustenance and most of these lands
were/are under use for other than
agricultural purposes, we deem it appropriate
to invoke our powers under Article 142 of the
Constitution and dispense with the compliance
of Chapters II and III of the 2013 Act
whereunder it is essential to prepare a
Social Impact Assessment Study Report and/or
to develop alternative multi-crop irrigated
agricultural land. We do so to ensure that
the timeline of one year extended at (a)
above to complete the acquisition process can
be adhered to by the appellants and the
GNCTD, which would also likely be beneficial
to the expropriated landowners;
o) Similarly, compliance with sections 13, 14,
16 to 20 of the 2013 Act can be dispensed
with as the subject-lands are predominantly
urban/semi-urban in nature and had earlier
been acquired for public purposes of
paramount importance. In order to simplify
the compliance of direction at (a) above, it
is further directed that every Notification
issued under section 4(1) of the 1894 Act in
this batch of cases, shall be treated as a
Preliminary Notification within the meaning
of section 11 of the 2013 Act, and shall be
deemed to have been published as on 01st
January, 2014;
p) The Collector shall provide hearing of
objections as per section 15 of the 2013 Act
without insisting for any Social Impact
Assessment Report and shall, thereafter,
proceed to take necessary steps as per the
procedure contemplated under section 21
onwards of Chapter-IV of 2013 Act, save and
except where compliance of any provision has
been expressly or impliedly dispensed with;
q) The landowners may submit their objections
15
within a period of four weeks from the date
of pronouncement of this order. Such
objections shall not question the legality of
the acquisition process and shall be limited
only to clauses (a) and (b) of section 15(1)
of the 2013 Act;
r) The Collector shall publish a public notice
on his website and in one English and one
vernacular newspapers, within two weeks of
expiry of the period of four weeks granted
under direction (f) above;
s) The Collector shall, thereafter, pass an
award as early as possible but not exceeding
six months, regardless of the maximum period
of twelve months contemplated under section
25 of the 2013 Act. The market value of the
land shall be assessed as on 01st January,
2014 and the compensation shall be awarded
along with all other monetary benefits in
accordance with the provisions of the 2013
Act except the claim like rehabilitation
etc.;
t) The Collector shall consider all the
parameters prescribed under section 28 of the
2013 Act for determining the compensation for
the acquired land. Similarly, the Collector
shall determine the market value of the
building or assets attached with the land in
accordance with section 29 and shall further
award solatium in accordance with section 30
of the 2013 Act;
u) In the peculiar facts and circumstances of
this case, since it is difficult to reverse
the clock back, the compliance of Chapter (V)
pertaining to “Rehabilitation and
Resettlement Award” is hereby dispensed with;
and
v) The expropriated landowners shall be entitled
to seek reference for enhancement of
compensation in accordance with Chapter-VIII
of the 2013 Act.
4. It is clarified that the extension of one year, as granted to
the Authorities for completion of acquisition in sub-para (a)
reproduced above, will commence from the date of this order.
5. The Miscellaneous Applications are, accordingly, disposed of.
16
6. As a result, pending interlocutory applications, if any, also
stand disposed of.
……………….J.
(SURYA KANT)
……………….J.
(DIPANKAR DATTA)
……………….J.
(UJJAL BHUYAN)
New Delhi;
December 11, 2024
17
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE/INHERENT JURISDICTION
MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. OF 2024
[DIARY No.1460 OF 2023]
IN
REVIEW PETITION (C) DIARY NO.21372/2019
IN
CIVIL APPEAL NO.6269/2017
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY PETITIONER
Vs.
SIDDHARTH KAPOOR & ORS. RESPONDENTS
O R D E R
1. Delay condoned.
2. In view of the fact that C.A. No.1596/2023 filed by the
Government of NCT of Delhi against the impugned judgment stood
allowed on 13.03.2023 and the High Court judgment has already been
set aside, the instant miscellaneous application, filed by DDA for
recall of order dated 20.08.2019 of this Court, has become
infructuous.
18
3. The miscellaneous application is dismissed as having become
infructuous.
………………..J.
(SURYA KANT)
…………………J.
(DIPANKAR DATTA)
………………..J.
(UJJAL BHUYAN)
NEW DELHI;
DECEMBER 11, 2024
19
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE/INHERENT JURISDICTION
MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. OF 2024
[DIARY No.3577 OF 2023]
IN
REVIEW PETITION(C) DIARY NO.27770/2021
IN
CIVIL APPEAL NO.6119/2017
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY PETITIONER
Vs.
SHAKEEL AHMED & ORS. RESPONDENTS
O R D E R
1. Delay condoned.
2. In view of the fact that C.A. No.739/2023 filed by the
Government of NCT of Delhi against the impugned judgment stood
allowed on 09.02.2023 and the High Court judgment has already been
set aside, the instant miscellaneous application, filed by DDA for
recall of order dated 03.03.2022 of this Court, has become
infructuous.
20
3. The miscellaneous application is dismissed as having become
infructuous.
………………..J.
(SURYA KANT)
…………………J.
(DIPANKAR DATTA)
………………..J.
(UJJAL BHUYAN)
NEW DELHI;
DECEMBER 11, 2024
21
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE/INHERENT JURISDICTION
MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. OF 2024
[DIARY No.14745 OF 2023]
IN
REVIEW PETITION (C) DIARY NO.8509/2019
IN
CIVIL APPEAL NO.4280/2017
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY PETITIONER
Vs.
MANISH & ORS. RESPONDENTS
O R D E R
1. Delay condoned.
2. In view of the fact that C.A. No.738/2023 filed by the
Government of NCT of Delhi against the impugned judgment stood
allowed on 09.02.2023 and the High Court judgment has already been
set aside, the instant miscellaneous application, filed by DDA for
recall of order dated 01.08.2019 of this Court, has become
infructuous.
22
3. The miscellaneous application is dismissed as having become
infructuous.
………………..J.
(SURYA KANT)
…………………J.
(DIPANKAR DATTA)
………………..J.
(UJJAL BHUYAN)
NEW DELHI;
DECEMBER 11, 2024
23
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE/INHERENT JURISDICTION
MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. OF 2024
[DIARY No.1713 OF 2023]
IN
REVIEW PETITION(C) DIARY NO.188/2022
IN
CIVIL APPEAL NO.6249/2017
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY PETITIONER
Vs.
ISHAAQ & ORS. RESPONDENTS
O R D E R
1. Delay condoned.
2. Civil Appeal No.6626/2024 titled ‘Government of NCT of Delhi
vs. Ishaaq and others’ stands partly allowed by us vide judgment
dated 17.05.2024 reported as ‘Government of NCT of Delhi and
another vs. BSK Realtors LLP and another’, (2024) 7 SCC 370,
wherein, as Item 17 in Group E of the judgement, the impugned
judgement of the High Court was set aside and the matter was
remitted to the High Court for fresh adjudication.
3. In view of the fact that the impugned judgement of the High
Court has already been set aside, and the matter is before the High
24
Court, the instant Miscellaneous Application is dismissed as having
become infructuous.
………………..J.
(SURYA KANT)
…………………J.
(DIPANKAR DATTA)
………………..J.
(UJJAL BHUYAN)
NEW DELHI;
DECEMBER 11, 2024
25
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE/INHERENT JURISDICTION
MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. OF 2024
[DIARY No.12740 OF 2023]
IN
REVIEW PETITION (C) DIARY NO.9299/2019
IN
CIVIL APPEAL NO.6227/2017
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY PETITIONER
Vs.
EMMSONS INTERNATIONAL LTD. & ORS. RESPONDENTS
O R D E R
1. Delay condoned.
2. Civil Appeal No.6621/2024 titled ‘Government of NCT of Delhi
vs. Emmsons International Ltd. and others’ stands partly allowed by
us vide judgment dated 17.05.2024 reported as ‘Government of NCT of
Delhi and another vs. BSK Realtors LLP and another’, (2024) 7 SCC
370, wherein, as Item 14 in Group E of the judgement, the impugned
judgement of the High Court was set aside and the matter was
remitted to the High Court for fresh adjudication.
3. In view of the fact that the impugned judgement of the High
Court has already been set aside, and the matter is before the High
26
Court, the instant Miscellaneous Application is dismissed as having
become infructuous.
………………..J.
(SURYA KANT)
…………………J.
(DIPANKAR DATTA)
………………..J.
(UJJAL BHUYAN)
NEW DELHI;
DECEMBER 11, 2024
27
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE/INHERENT JURISDICTION
MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. OF 2024
[DIARY No.13544 OF 2023]
IN
CIVIL APPEAL NO.6260/2023
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY PETITIONER
Vs.
M/S. BGNS INFRATECH PVT. LTD. AND ORS. RESPONDENTS
O R D E R
1. Delay condoned.
2. Civil Appeal No.6623/2024 titled ‘Government of NCT of Delhi
vs. M/s BGNS Infratech Pvt. Ltd. company and others’ stands partly
allowed by us vide judgment dated 17.05.2024 reported as
‘Government of NCT of Delhi and another vs. BSK Realtors LLP and
another’, (2024) 7 SCC 370, wherein, as Item 16 in Group E of the
judgement, the impugned judgement of the High Court was set aside
and the matter was remitted to the High Court for fresh
adjudication.
3. In view of the fact that the impugned judgement of the High
Court has already been set aside, and the matter is before the High
28
Court, the instant Miscellaneous Application is dismissed as having
become infructuous.
………………..J.
(SURYA KANT)
…………………J.
(DIPANKAR DATTA)
………………..J.
(UJJAL BHUYAN)
NEW DELHI;
DECEMBER 11, 2024
29
ITEM NO.1 COURT NO.3 SECTION XIV-A
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION ………Diary No(s).5463/2023 In D No.
10069/2021
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
VEENA MAHAJAN Respondent(s)
(FOR FOR RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER ON IA 27358/2023 FOR
CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 27361/2023 FOR
IA No. 27361/2023 – CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING
IA No. 27358/2023 – RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER)
WITH
Diary No(s).10553/2023 (XIV-A)
(FOR FOR RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER ON IA 51662/2023 FOR
CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 51663/2023
IA No. 51663/2023 – CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING
IA No. 51662/2023 – RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER)
Diary No(s). 12548/2023 (XIV-A)
(FOR FOR RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER ON IA 61462/2023 FOR
CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 61463/2023
IA No. 61463/2023 – CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING
IA No. 61462/2023 – RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER)
Diary No(s). 12549/2023 (XIV-A)
( FOR MODIFICATION ON IA 61467/2023
IA No. 61467/2023 – MODIFICATION)
Diary No(s). 12592/2023 (XIV-A)
IA No. 61699/2023 – CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING
IA No. 61696/2023 – RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER)
Diary No(s). 12635/2023 (XIV-A)
IA No. 61947/2023 – CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING
IA No. 61944/2023 – RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER)
Diary No(s). 12639/2023 (XIV-A)
(FOR RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER ON IA 61957/2023
FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 61958/2023
IA No. 61958/2023 – CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING
IA No. 61957/2023 – RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER)
Diary No(s). 13159/2023 (XIV-A)
(FOR RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER ON IA 65299/2023
FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 65302/2023
IA No. 65302/2023 – CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING
IA No. 65299/2023 – RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER)
Diary No(s). 13254/2023 (XIV-A)
(FOR MODIFICATION OF COURT ORDER ON IA 65663/2023
IA No. 65663/2023 – MODIFICATION OF COURT ORDER)
Diary No(s). 13541/2023 (XIV-A)
30
(FOR FOR RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER ON IA 66892/2023 FOR
CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 66895/2023 FOR EXEMPTION FROM
FILING O.T. ON IA 66896/2023
IA No. 66895/2023 – CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING
IA No. 66896/2023 – EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.
IA No. 66892/2023 – RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER)
Diary No(s). 14289/2023 (XIV-A)
(FOR FOR MODIFICATION ON IA 69724/2023 FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN
FILING ON IA 133033/2023 4
IA No. 133033/2023 – CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING
IA No. 69724/2023 – MODIFICATION)
Diary No(s). 14854/2023 (XIV-A)
(FOR RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER ON IA 72646/2023
FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 72647/2023
IA No. 72647/2023 – CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING
IA No. 72646/2023 – RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER)
Diary No(s). 17744/2023 (XIV-A)
(FOR FOR RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER ON IA 87113/2023 FOR
CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 87117/2023 FOR EXEMPTION FROM
FILING O.T. ON IA 87119/2023
IA No. 87117/2023 – CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING
IA No. 87119/2023 – EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.
IA No. 87113/2023 – RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER)
Diary No(s). 20490/2023 (XIV-A)
(FOR CLARIFICATION/DIRECTION ON IA 100543/2023
FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 175888/2024
IA No. 100543/2023 – CLARIFICATION/DIRECTION
IA No. 175888/2024 – CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING)
Diary No(s).21716/2023 (XIV-A)
(FOR FOR RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER ON IA 107253/2023 FOR
CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 107256/2023
IA No. 107256/2023 – CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING
IA No. 107253/2023 – RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER)
Diary No(s).21786/2023 (XIV-A)
(FOR FOR RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER ON IA 107603/2023 FOR
CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 107604/2023
IA No. 107604/2023 – CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING
IA No. 107603/2023 – RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER)
Diary No(s). 23142/2023 (XIV-A)
(FOR RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER ON IA 112726/2023
FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 112727/2023
IA No. 112727/2023 – CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING
IA No. 112726/2023 – RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER)
Diary No(s). 34776/2023 (XIV-A)
(FOR RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER ON IA 170912/2023
IA No. 170912/2023 – RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER)
Diary No(s). 34835/2023 (XIV-A)
(FOR FOR RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER ON IA 170530/2023)
Diary No(s). 38181/2023 (XIV-A)
(FOR RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER ON IA 189440/2023
FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 189444/2023
FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 189445/2023
IA No. 189444/2023 – CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING
31
IA No. 189445/2023 – EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.
IA No. 189440/2023 – RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER)
Diary No(s). 39310/2022 (XIV-A)
(FOR MODIFICATION ON IA 188199/2022
IA No. 188199/2022 – MODIFICATION)
Diary No(s). 39883/2022 (XIV-A)
IA No. 191547/2022 – CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING
IA No. 191540/2022 – RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER)
Diary No(s). 40773/2022 (XIV-A)
(FOR RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER ON IA 196358/2022
FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 196363/2022
IA No. 196363/2022 – CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING
IA No. 196358/2022 – RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER)
Diary No(s). 40951/2022 (XIV-A)
IA No. 197171/2022 – CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING
IA No. 197166/2022 – RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER)
Diary No(s). 42177/2022 (XIV-A)
IA No. 55189/2023 – CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING
IA No. 202497/2022 – RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER)
Diary No(s). 42745/2022 (XIV-A)
IA No. 59442/2023 – CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING
IA No. 205357/2022 – RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER)
Diary No(s). 402/2023 (XIV-A)
(FOR MODIFICATION OF COURT ORDER ON IA 1057/2023
FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 138916/2023
IA No. 138916/2023 – CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING
IA No. 1057/2023 – MODIFICATION OF COURT ORDER)
Diary No(s). 446/2023 (XIV-A)
(FOR RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER ON IA 1444/2023
FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 1447/2023
IA No. 1447/2023 – CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING
IA No. 1444/2023 – RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER)
Diary No(s). 674/2023 (XIV-A)
(FOR RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER ON IA 2465/2023
FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 2468/2023
IA No. 2468/2023 – CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING
IA No. 2465/2023 – RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER)
Diary No(s). 1001/2023 (XIV-A)
( FOR RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER ON IA 4214/2023
FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 4217/2023
IA No. 4217/2023 – CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING
IA No. 4214/2023 – RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER)
Diary No(s). 1460/2023 (XIV-A)
IA No. 6694/2023 – CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING
IA No. 6696/2023 – EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.
IA No. 6691/2023 – RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER)
Diary No(s). 1464/2023 (XIV-A)
IA No. 6695/2023 – CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING
IA No. 6697/2023 – EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.
IA No. 6693/2023 – RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER)
Diary No(s). 1465/2023 (XIV-A)
IA No. 6703/2023 – CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING
IA No. 6709/2023 – EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.
32
IA No. 6701/2023 – RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER)
Diary No(s). 1466/2023 (XIV-A)
IA No. 6704/2023 – CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING
IA No. 6705/2023 – EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.
IA No. 6702/2023 – RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER)
Diary No(s). 1713/2023 (XIV-A)
(FOR RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER ON IA 7991/2023
FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 7998/2023
IA No. 7998/2023 – CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING
IA No. 7991/2023 – RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER)
Diary No(s). 3577/2023 (XIV-A)
(FOR RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER ON IA 17677/2023
FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 17678/2023
IA No. 17678/2023 – CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING
IA No. 17677/2023 – RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER)
Diary No(s). 4091/2023 (XIV-A)
IA No. 20072/2023 – CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING
IA No. 20073/2023 – EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.
IA No. 20071/2023 – RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER)
Diary No(s). 4990/2023 (XIV-A)
IA No. 24828/2023 – CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING
IA No. 24831/2023 – EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.
IA No. 24827/2023 – RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER)
Diary No(s). 5711/2023 (XIV-A)
(FOR RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER ON IA 28698/2023
FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 28701/2023
IA No. 28701/2023 – CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING
IA No. 28698/2023 – RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER)
Diary No(s). 6510/2023 (XIV-A)
(FOR FOR RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER ON IA 32992/2023 FOR
CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 33016/2023
IA No. 33016/2023 – CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING
IA No. 32992/2023 – RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER)
Diary No(s). 6523/2023 (XIV-A)
(FOR FOR RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER ON IA 33041/2023 FOR
CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 33043/2023
IA No. 33043/2023 – CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING
IA No. 33041/2023 – RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER)
Diary No(s). 6524/2023 (XIV-A)
(FOR RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER ON IA 33039/2023 FOR CONDONATION OF
DELAY IN FILING ON IA 33042/2023
IA No. 33042/2023 – CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING
IA No. 33039/2023 – RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER)
Diary No(s). 10561/2023 (XIV-A)
(FOR RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER ON IA 51671/2023 FOR CONDONATION OF
DELAY IN FILING ON IA 51673/2023
IA No. 51673/2023 – CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING
IA No. 51671/2023 – RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER)
Diary No(s). 11767/2023 (XIV-A)
(IA No. 57785/2023- Application for Condonation of delay in filing
M.A.
IA No. 57785/2023 – RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER
IA No. 57784/2023 – RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER)
33
Diary No(s). 12740/2023 (XIV-A)
IA No. 147178/2023 – CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING
IA No. 62599/2023 – RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER)
Diary No(s). 12978/2023 (XIV-A)
IA No. 64709/2023 – CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING
IA No. 64708/2023 – RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER)
Diary No(s). 13420/2023 (XIV-A)
IA No. 131237/2023 – CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING
IA No. 66347/2023 – RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER)
Diary No(s). 13544/2023 (XIV-A)
IA No. 66901/2023 – CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING
IA No. 66902/2023 – EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.
IA No. 66900/2023 – RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER)
Diary No(s). 14584/2023 (XIV-A)
IA No. 71274/2023 – CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING
IA No. 71275/2023 – RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER)
Diary No(s). 14601/2023 (XIV-A)
IA No. 71310/2023 – CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING
IA No. 71308/2023 – RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER)
Diary No(s). 14745/2023 (XIV-A)
(FOR RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER ON IA 72126/2023 FOR CONDONATION OF
DELAY IN FILING ON IA 72127/2023
IA No. 72127/2023 – CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING
IA No. 72126/2023 – RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER)
Diary No(s). 21344/2023 (XIV-A)
(FOR RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER ON IA 105101/2023
FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 105106/2023
FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 105108/2023
IA No. 105106/2023 – CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING
IA No. 105108/2023 – EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.
IA No. 105101/2023 – RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER)
Diary No(s). 22524/2023 (XIV-A)
IA No. 110340/2023 – CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING
IA No. 110338/2023 – RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER)
Diary No(s). 22699/2023 (XIV-A)
(FOR RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER ON IA 111150/2023
FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 111152/2023
IA No. 111152/2023 – CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING
IA No. 111150/2023 – RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER)
Diary No(s). 27415/2023 (XIV-A)
IA No. 166957/2023 – CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING
IA No. 166958/2023 – EXEMPTION FROM FILING PAPER BOOKS
IA No. 130925/2023 – RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER)
Diary No(s). 31028/2023 (XIV-A)
Diary No(s). 33298/2023 (XIV-A)
(FOR RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER ON IA 162108/2023
FOR CLARIFICATION/DIRECTION ON IA 153912/2024
FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 175628/2024
IA No. 153912/2024 – CLARIFICATION/DIRECTION
IA No. 175628/2024 – CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING
IA No. 162108/2023 – RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER)
Diary No(s). 37258/2023 (XIV-A)
(FOR APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS ON IA 184033/2023
34
IA No. 184033/2023 – APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS)
Diary No(s). 7295/2024 (XIV-A)
IA No. 40166/2024 – CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING
IA No. 40160/2024 – RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER)
Date : 11-12-2024 These matters were called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPANKAR DATTA
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYANFor Petitioner(s) Ms. Sunieta Ojha, AOR
Mr. Sanjay Poddar, Sr. Adv.
Ms. Shalini Chandra, AOR
Mr. Ishaan Sharma, Adv.
Ms. Nandita Misra, Adv.
Mr. Ashwani Kumar, AOR
Ms. Binu Tamta, AOR
M/S. Saharya & Co., AOR
Ms. Sujeeta Srivastava, AOR
Mr. Sanjay Parikh, Sr. Adv.
Mr. Pukhrambam Ramesh Kumar, AOR
Mr. Ritwik Parikh, Adv.
Mr. Satwik Parikh, Adv.
Ms. Kritika, Adv.
Mr. Rajat K. Mittal, Adv.
Mr. Prateek Srivastava, Adv.
Ms. Rajkumari Divyasana, Adv.
Mr. Nishit Agrawal, AOR
Mr. Sanjay Poddar, Sr. Adv.
Ms. Niharika Ahluwalia, AOR
Mr. Arpit Sharma, Adv.
Mr. Himaghn Jain, Adv.
Ms. Sonakshi Chaturvedi, Adv.
Mr. Sanjay Poddar, Sr. Adv.
Mr. Ishaan Sharma, Adv.
Ms. Mitali Gupta, Adv.
Mr. Kumar Shitij, Adv.
Mr. Nitin Mishra, AOR
Mr. Shubham Shukla, Adv.
Ms. Shambhavi Sharma, Adv.
Mr. Saksham Kaushik, Adv.
35
Mr. Aditya Kashyap, Adv.
Mr. Govind, Adv.
Mr. Sanjay Poddar, Sr. Adv.
Ms. Manika Tripathy, AOR
Mr. Ashutosh Kaushik, Adv.
Mr. Barun Dey, Adv.
Mr. Rony John, Adv.
Mr. Vansh Kalra, Adv.
Mr. Sanjay Poddar, Sr. Adv.
Ms. Malvika Kapila, AOR
Mr. Ishaan Sharma, Adv.
Ms. Tanwangi Shukla, Adv.
Ms. Harbani Shinh, Adv.
For Respondent(s) Mr. T. L. Garg, AOR
Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, AOR
Mr. Dharam Raj Ohlan, Adv.
Mr. Mukesh Kumar, Adv.
Mr. Leela Dhar Prajapat, Adv.
Mr. Babangir Uttamgir Gosawi, Adv.
Dr. Varnit Sharma, Adv.
Mr. Naveet Kansal, Adv.
Mr. Vishwa Pal Singh, AOR
Mr. Chandra Bhushan Prasad, AOR
Mr. Vikas Kumar, AOR
Mr. Gagan Gupta, AOR
Mr. Atul Kumar, AOR
Mr. Rajender Pd. Saxena, AOR
Mr. Rajendra Prasad Saxena, Adv.
Mr. N. P. Sahni, Adv.
Mr. Vineet Sinha, Adv.
Dr. Sumant Bharadwaj, Adv.
Mr. Vedant Bharadwaj, Adv.
Ms. Mridula Ray Bharadwaj, AOR
Mr. Apoorva Chauhan, Adv.
Mr. Arvind Kumar Gupta, AOR
Mr. Nirmal S.Chechi, Adv.
Mr. Veerender Singh, Adv.
Mr. Abhishek Chauhan, Adv.
36
Mr. Ashutosh Dubey, AOR
Ms. Rajshri A. Dubey, Adv.
Mr. Amit P. Shahi, Adv.
Mr. H.B. Dubey, Adv.
Mr. Amit Kumar, Adv.
Mr. Rajendra Anbhule, Adv.
Mr. Rahul Sethi, Adv.
Mrs. Sona Khan, Adv.
Mr. Bharat Beriwal, Adv.
Mr. Rajiv Ranjan Dwivedi, AOR
Mr. Ashok Mathur, AOR
Mr. Karan Thakur, Adv.
Mr. D. S. Mahra, AOR
Mr. Ashok Anand, AOR
Mr. Kameshwar Gumber, Adv.
Ms. Charu Ambwani, AOR
Ms. Sushma Suri, AOR
Mr. Harish Pandey, AOR
Mr. Kaushik Poddar, AOR
Mr. Rajiv Kumar Ghawana, Adv.
Mr. Siddharth Vasudev, Adv.
Mr. T.V.S. Raghavendra Sreyas, AOR
Mr. Vikalp Chandela, Adv.
Mr. Mubashir, Adv.
Mr. Sachin Chaudhary, Adv.
Mr. Ashish Kumar, Adv.
Ms. Neeru Vaid, AOR
Ms. Shalu Sharma, AORMs. Ranjeeta Rohatgi, AOR
Ms. Shrika Gautam, Adv.
Mr. Vikas Mehta, AOR
Mr. U.K. Uniyal, Sr. Adv.
Mr. Dinesh Kumar Garg, Adv.
Mr. Abhishek Garg, Adv.
Mr. Dhananjay Garg, AOR
Mr. P.K. Bajaj, Adv.
Mr. N S Vasisht, Adv.
Ms. Jyoti Kataria, Adv.
37
Mr. Varun Kapur, AOR
Mr. Munawwar Naseem, Adv.
Ms. Sanjna Dua, Adv.
Ms. Namrata Langade, Adv.
For M/S. Dua Associates, AORMr. Vikramjeet Banerjee, A.S.G.
Mr. K.M. Nataraj, ASG
Mr. Shailesh Madiyal, Sr. Adv.
Mr. N. Vishakhamurthy, Adv.
Mr. Mukesh Kumar Maroria, AOR
Mrs. Sunita Sharma, Adv.
Mr. Balendu Shekhar, Adv.
Mr. Anukalp Jain, Adv.
Mr. A K Kaul, Adv.
Mr. Rohit Pandey, Adv.
Mr. Raman Yadav, Adv.
Mr. Padmesh Mishra, Adv.
Mr. Ashok Panigrahi, Adv.
Mr. A K Panda, Adv.
Mr. Bankey Bihari, AOR
Ms. Esha Mazumdar, Adv.
Mr. Setu Niket, Adv.
Ms. Unni Maya, Adv.
Mr. Devansh Khattar, Adv.
Ms. Priyanjali Singh, AORMr. K Parmeshwar, Sr. Adv.
Mr. Sudeep Singh, Adv.
Mr. Kailashi Uday Kapoor, Adv.
Mr. Avinash Poddar, Adv.
Ms. Neelam Singh, AOR
Mr. Pramod B. Agarwala, AOR
Mr. Jayant Mehta, Sr. Adv.
Mr. Bharat Arora, Adv.
Mr. Lakshay Raheja, Adv.
Mr. Gourav Arora, Adv.
Mr. Manikya Khanna, Adv.
For M/S. Vedya Partners Aor, AOR
Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, AOR
Ms. Smita Maan, AOR
Mr. Vishal Maan, Adv.
Mr. Kartik Dabas, Adv.
Mr. Jayant Tewathia, Adv.
Mr. Aditya Singh, Adv.
38
Mr. Abhay Kumar, AOR
Mr. Shagun Ruhil, Adv.
Mr. Karan Chopra, Adv.
Mr. Saurabh Mishra, Adv.
Ms. Kusum Pandey, Adv.
Mr. Satya Darshi Sanjay, A.S.G.
Mr. B.K. Satija, Adv.
Mr. Padmesh Mishra, Adv.
Mr. Samta Pushkarna Mishra, Adv.
Mr. C.K. Sharma, Adv.
Mr. Adarsh Kr. Pandey, Adv.
Mr. Gautam Kumar, Adv.
Mr. Manish, Adv.
Mr. Vishnu Kant, Adv.
Dr. N. Visakamurthy, AOR
Mr. Atul Kumar, AOR
Mr. Sweety Singh, Adv.
Ms. Sweety Singh, Adv.
Ms. Archana Kumari, Adv.
Mr. Rahul Pandey, Adv.
Mr. Sudipto Singha Roy, Adv.
Mr. Himanshu Raj, Adv.
Ms. Harsh Kumar, Adv.
Mr. Harsh Kumar, Adv.
Mr. VB Pandey, Adv.
Mr. AVS Kadyan, Adv.
Mr. Tara Chauhan, Adv.
Mr. Rachita Kadyan, Adv.
Ms. Rachita Kadyan, Adv.
Ms. Sujeeta Srivastava, AOR
Ms. Prachi Bajpai, AOR
Mr. Chandra Prakash, AOR
Mr. Vivek Singh, Adv.
Mr. C.P. Rajwar, Adv.
Mr. Binay Kumar, Adv.
Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Adv.
Mr. Sahil Tagotra, AOR
Mr. Sujay Jain, Adv.
Mr. Amitabh Kumar Verma, Adv.
Mr. Mahesh Prasad, Adv.
Mr. Sher Singh, Adv.
Mr. Mukesh Kumar Verma, Adv.
Ms. Muskan Bhagat, Adv.
Mr. Mumtaz Alam Siddiqui, Adv.
39
Mr. Alok K. Prasad, Adv.
Mr. Babu Malayil, Adv.
Mr. Rajesh Singh Chauhan, AOR
Mr. S K Rout, Adv.
Mr. Ganesh Singh, Adv.
Mr. Amit Acharya, Adv.
Mr. Aman Mehrotra, Adv.
Mr. Priyonkoo Anjan Gogoi, Adv.
Mr. Priti, Adv.
Ms. Priti, Adv.
Mr. Prithvi Pal, AOR
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
O R D E RD.No.12635/2023 in C.A.No.8154/2026 and D.No.12639/2023 in
D.No.15267/2021
1. As per the Office Report, service is not complete on the
respondents.
2. Let the applicant/DDA serve them through dasti notice,
returnable on 08.01.2025.
MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION ………..D.NO.5463/2023 In D. No.
10069/2021 and connected matters
Delay condoned, and leave granted.
The applications for substitution are allowed, subject to
all just exceptions.
The Civil Appeal and Miscellaneous Applications are
allowed in terms of the signed order.
As a result, pending interlocutory applications, if any,
also stand disposed of.
MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION ………../2024 (D.NO.12548/2023) In D. No.
5670/2022 and connected matters
Delay condoned.
Leave granted.
The Miscellaneous Applications for recalling of orders,
as also RP (C) Diary No.5670/2022, are allowed, and order dated
31.08.2016 in Civil Appeal No.8638/2016, order dated 22.09.2016 in
40
Civil Appeal No.9600/2016, and order dated 04.05.2017 in Civil
Appeal No.6259/2017 are recalled. The appeals are partly allowed in
terms of the signed order.
As a result, the pending interlocutory applications, if
any, also stands disposed of.
M.A…………D.No.13541/2023 In C.A.No.8525/2016 and connected matter
Delay condoned.
The Miscellaneous Applications are disposed of in terms
of the signed order.
As a result, pending interlocutory applications, if any,
also stand disposed of.
M.A…………/2024 (D.No.10553/2023) In C.A.No.8519/2016 with
C.A.No.8519/2016
Delay condoned.
The Miscellaneous Application for recalling of order is
allowed, and order dated 31.08.2016 is recalled. The appeals are
partly allowed in terms of the signed order.
As a result, the pending interlocutory application, if
any, also stands disposed of.
M.A.No…………./2024 (D.No.13159/2023) In D.No.18178/2022
Delay condoned.
The instant Miscellaneous Application is dismissed as
having become infructuous in terms of the signed order.
As a result, the pending interlocutory application, if
any, also stands disposed of.
Diary No.12740/2023, Diary No.13544/2023, Diary No.1713/2023, Diary
No.14745/2023, Diary No.3577/2023 & Diary No.1460/2023
Delay condoned.
The Miscellaneous Applications are dismissed as having become
41
infructuous in terms of the signed order.
As a result, the pending interlocutory application, if any,
also stands disposed of.
Rest of the matters
List on 08.01.2025.
(SATISH KUMAR YADAV) (ARJUN BISHT) (PREETHI T.C.)
ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR AR-CUM-PS ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
(Signed orders in MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION ………..D.NO.5463/2023 In
D. No. 10069/2021 and connected matters, MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION
………../2024 (D.NO.12548/2023) In D. No. 5670/2022 and connected
matters, M.A…………D.No.13541/2023 In C.A.No.8525/2016 and connected
matter, M.A…………/2024 (D.No.10553/2023) In C.A.No.8519/2016 with
C.A.No.8519/2016 and M.A.No…………./2024 (D.No.13159/2023) In
D.No.18178/2022 In Diary No.12740/2023, Diary No.13544/2023, Diary
No.1713/2023, Diary No.14745/2023, Diary No.3577/2023 & Diary
No.1460/2023 are placed on the file)