Safir Alam vs The State Of Bihar on 9 January, 2025

0
23

Patna High Court – Orders

Safir Alam vs The State Of Bihar on 9 January, 2025

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.89812 of 2024
                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-48 Year-2024 Thana- SIKTA District- West Champaran
                 ======================================================
                 Safir Alam Son of Sheikh Sunad Resident of village - Jhumka, Police Station
                 - Sikta, District - West Champaran.

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr.Brij Kishor Mishra, Adv.
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr.Narendra Kumar Singh, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH
                 MISHRA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   09-01-2025

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has earlier moved before this Court

with a prayer for anticipatory bail which was rejected vide

order dated 25.10.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 68960 of

2024.

3. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Sikta

P.S. Case No. 48 of 2024 instituted for the offences under

Sections 147, 148, 149, 224, 225, 341, 342, 323, 332, 333,

307, 353, 354(B), 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code and

Section 25(1-B)a & 35 of the Arms Act.

4. As per prosecution case, the petitioner along with
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.89812 of 2024(2) dt.09-01-2025
2/4

other co-accused attacked the police force which had gone to

arrest a wanted accused in connection with Sikta P.S. Case

No. 151 of 2023 and also to get him free, compelled the

police force to withdraw to save their lives. It is alleged that in

the alleged occurrence, several police personnel sustained

injuries over their bodies. It is also alleged that the police has

recovered live cartridge of 12 bore from the house of Safir

Aam (the petitioner).

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence as

alleged against him and has falsely been implicated in the

present case. He further submits that nothing incriminating

has been recovered from the conscious possession of the

petitioner. So far as recovery of one live cartridge is

concerned, the same has been recovered from the joint house

of the co-accused Shamim Alam who has already been

granted bail by this Court vide order dated 21.09.2024

passed in Cr. Misc. No. 49656 of 2024. He further submits

that the case of the present petitioner is on better footing

than the case of the co-accused Shamim Alam. The petitioner
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.89812 of 2024(2) dt.09-01-2025
3/4

has no concern with the alleged occurrence. There is a non-

compliance of Section 100 of the Cr.P.C. (now 103 of the

B.N.S.S.) which creates a serious doubt in the prosecution

case. The petitioner has seven criminal antecedents and is

languishing in judicial custody since 30.10.2024 without any

rhymes or reason.

6. On the other hand, learned A.P.P. for the State

has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the

petitioner.

7. Having heard rival contention of both the parties

and considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case

as also taking into account the period of custody of the

petitioner and the prayer for bail being based on parity, let the

petitioner, abovenamed, be released on bail, after framing

of charge if not already framed, on furnishing bail bonds

of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like

amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned

Court in connection with Sikta P.S. Case No. 48 of 2024,

subject to the following conditions;

(i) One of the bailor(s) shall be the own/close family
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.89812 of 2024(2) dt.09-01-2025
4/4

members of the petitioner.

(ii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and

shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by

the court and shall remain physically present as directed by

the Court and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates

without sufficient reasons, his bail bond shall be liable to be

cancelled by the court below.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J)
rishi/-

U         T
 



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here