Suresh Kumar S/O Late Shri Jagdish … vs The Baroda Rajasthan Kshetriya Gramin … on 13 January, 2025

0
187

Rajasthan High Court – Jaipur

Suresh Kumar S/O Late Shri Jagdish … vs The Baroda Rajasthan Kshetriya Gramin … on 13 January, 2025

Author: Sameer Jain

Bench: Sameer Jain

[2025:RJ-JP:1827]

        HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
                    BENCH AT JAIPUR

                    S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 366/2025

Suresh Kumar S/o Late Shri Jagdish Prasad, Aged About 38
Years, R/o Kheriyo Ki Dhani, Ward No. 1, Khetri, District
Jhunjhunu (Rajasthan)
                                                                       ----Petitioner
                                       Versus
1.       The Baroda Rajasthan Kshetriya Gramin Bank, Head
         Office, Ajmer Through Its Chairman, 2, 2343, Ana Sagar
         Circular Road, Tarachand Ka Bhatta, Vaishali Nagar,
         Ajmer, (Rajasthan) - 305004
2.       The     Regional      Manager,        Baroda        Rajasthan    Kshetriya
         Gramin      Bank,       Regional      Office      Singhana,     Jhunjhunu,
         District Jhunjhunu (Rajasthan)
                                                                    ----Respondents

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sunil Kumar Singodiya
For Respondent(s) :

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN

Order

13/01/2025

1. The instant petition is filed with the following prayers:-

“i) The respondents be directed to consider the candi-

dature of the Petitioner for Appointment on the com-
passionate ground according to the eligibility and qual-
ification of the Petitioner and further the respondents
be directed to give appointment on the compassionate
ground in place of his father on suitable post with all
consequential benefits.

ii) Any other order which this Hon’ble Court deems fit
in the facts and circumstances of the case may also be
passed in favour of the petitioner.”

2. Heard and considered./None present on behalf of the

petitioner.

(Downloaded on 20/01/2025 at 09:52:28 PM)

[2025:RJ-JP:1827] (2 of 2) [CW-366/2025]

3. Upon a perusal of the record, it is noted that the death

of the family member, against whom compassionate appointment

is sought, occurred on 26.05.2011. Thereafter, the instant petition

was filed seeking compassionate appointment in the Year 2015.

The petition has come up on board for hearing for the first time

today i.e. in the Year 2025. Ever since the filing of the instant

petition, no active steps were taken by the petitioner for the early

listing of the matter.

4. As on date, over 9 years have lapsed since the demise

of the earning family member, against whom compassionate

employment is sought. If compassionate appointment is made

now, the same shall be against the object and purpose for which

the appointment on compassionate grounds is provided. The

whole object of granting compassionate employment is to enable

the family to tide over the sudden crisis caused by the instant

death of the earning family member. The object is not to give such

family a post, much less a post held by the deceased family

member. In this regard, reliance can be placed upon the dictum of

the Hon’ble Apex Court as enunciated in Fertilizers and

Chemicals Travancore Ltd. and Ors. vs. Anusree K.B.

reported in AIR 2022 SC 4766.

5. As a result, in light of the foregoing observations, the

instant petition is dismissed. Pending applications, if any, stand

disposed of.

(SAMEER JAIN),J

JKP/22

(Downloaded on 20/01/2025 at 09:52:28 PM)

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

[ad_1]

Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here