Dr Mod Nath Mishra vs Pratyaya Amrit on 7 January, 2025

0
78


Dr Mod Nath Mishra vs Pratyaya Amrit on 7 January, 2025


Supreme Court – Daily Orders

Dr Mod Nath Mishra vs Pratyaya Amrit on 7 January, 2025

                                         IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
                                         CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                    CONTEMPT PETITION (C) No. 810/2024
                                                   IN
                                        CIVIL APPEAL No. 2943/2022


                      HARENDRA NATH UPADHYAY                               APPELLANT(s)


                                                   VERSUS

                      STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS.                             RESPONDENT(s)


                                                   O R D E R

Admittedly, the appellant was not a party in C.A. No.

2943/2022 which was disposed of by this Court by judgment and

order dated 13.04.2022.

In the circumstances, this Contempt Petition against the

said order is not at all maintainable. Hence, the same is

dismissed.

Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.

………………………………………………………,J.

( B.V. NAGARATHNA )

…………………………………………………………,J.

( SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA )

NEW DELHI;

                      JANUARY 07, 2025
Signature Not Verified

Digitally signed by
RADHA SHARMA
Date: 2025.01.18
12:13:12 IST
Reason:




                                                     1
ITEM NO.23                   COURT NO.8                           SECTION XVI

               S U P R E M E C O U R T O F            I N D I A
                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

CONMT.PET.(C) No. 579/2022 in C.A. No. 2944/2022

DR MOD NATH MISHRA & ORS. Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

PRATYAYA AMRIT & ORS. Respondent(s)

(IA No. 103326/2022 – EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.)

WITH
CONMT.PET.(C) No. 810/2024 in C.A. No. 2943/2022 (XVI)
(IA No. 214743/2024 – APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION
IA No. 196400/2024 – EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.)

Date : 07-01-2025 These matters were called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE B.V. NAGARATHNA
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA

For Petitioner(s) Mr. Chand Qureshi, AOR
Mr. Mujahid Ahmad, Adv.

Mr. Mohammad Akbar Khan, Adv.
Mr. Aman Afsar, Adv.

Mr. Mohammed Moin Ulla, Adv.
Mr. Mairaj Ashraf Ansari, Adv.
Ms. Akansha Kohili, Adv.

Mr. Dhirendra Kumar Verma, Adv.
Mr. Rakesh Ranjan, Adv.

Mr. Sandeep Jha, Adv.

Mr. Ram Ekbal Roy, Adv.

Mr. Aman Nihal, Adv.

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Singh, Adv.
Ms. Kumudini Priyadarshini, Adv.
Mr. Binay Kumar Das, AOR

For Respondent(s) Mr. Manish Kumar, AOR

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
O R D E R

De-tag Conmt. Pet.(C) No. 810/2024 in C.A. No.

2943/2022 from Conmt. Pet.(C) No. 579/2022 in C.A. No.

2
2944/2022.

Learned counsel for the respondents has filed a

compilation of affidavits and other documents.

On perusal of the same, we find that there is a

deviation with regard to the quantum of gratuity that has

been paid to the complainants.

In order to seek further instructions in the

matter(s), list the matter(s) on 28.01.2025.

CONMT. PET.(C) No. 810/2024 in C.A. No. 2943/2022:

The Contempt Petition is dismissed in terms of the

signed order which is placed on the file.

Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed

of.

(RADHA SHARMA) (DIVYA BABBAR)
ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS COURT MASTER (NSH)

3

Now Is the Time to Think About Your Small-Business Success

Find people with high expectations and a low tolerance...

Program Will Lend $10M to Detroit Minority Businesses

Find people with high expectations and a low tolerance...

Kansas City Has a Massive Array of Big National Companies

Find people with high expectations and a low tolerance...