Jharkhand High Court
Md. Hafij Ansari vs The State Of Jharkhand … Opposite … on 17 January, 2025
Author: Anil Kumar Choudhary
Bench: Anil Kumar Choudhary
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
A.B.A. No. 51 of 2025
------
1. Md. Hafij Ansari, aged about 48 years old, son of Md.
Alam Ansari, resident of Village -Chakla, Irba, Post Office
and Police Station -Ormanjhi, District -Ranchi
2. Sakiman Nisa, aged about 68 years old, wife of Taharat
Ansari, daughter of late Shekh Alaudin, resident of Village
-Irba, Post Office and Police Station -Ormanjhi, District –
Ranchi. ... Petitioners
Versus
The State of Jharkhand ... Opposite Party
------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
——
For the Petitioners : Mr. Haider Ali, Advocate
For the State : Mr. Someshwar Roy, Addl. P.P.
——
Order No.02 Dated- 17.01.2025
Heard the parties.
Apprehending their arrest, the petitioners have moved this
Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail in connection with
Ormanjhi P.S. Case No.100 of 2024 registered under sections 406/
420/467/468/471/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
The Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the
allegation against the petitioners is that the co-accused persons
namely Ahmad Ali, Md.Taslim Ansari and Samsul Ansari
fraudulently induced the informant to deliver Rs.1,30,00,000/- and
the only allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners have
executed a power of attorney in favour of Samsul Ansari and
thereafter Samsul Ansari got the sale deed registered in favour of the
informant and when the informant enquired about the same, the
informant found that the land has been sold to someone else. It is
further submitted that the allegations against the petitioners are all
false and there is no allegation of entrustment of any money to the
petitioners nor there is any allegation against the petitioner of
cheating or dishonestly inducing anybody. It is then submitted that
there is no allegation against the petitioners of committing any
forgery and the main allegation is against the co-accused persons
namely Ahmad Ali, Md.Taslim Ansari and Samsul Ansari. It is next
submitted that the petitioners undertake to furnish sufficient
security including cash security and also undertake to cooperate
with the investigation of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the
petitioners be given the privilege of anticipatory bail.
Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for grant of
anticipatory bail.
Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as
discussed above, I am of the opinion that it is a fit case where the
abovenamed petitioners be given the privilege of anticipatory bail.
Hence, in the event of their arrest or surrender within a period of six
weeks from the date of this order, they shall be released on bail on
depositing cash security of Rs.20,000/- each and on furnishing bail
bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two
sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief
Judicial Magistrate, Ranchi, in connection with Ormanjhi P.S. Case
No.100 of 2024 with the condition that the petitioners will cooperate
with the investigation of the case and appear before the
Investigating Officer as and when noticed by him and will furnish
their mobile number and a copy of their Aadhar Card in the court
below with the undertaking that they will not change their mobile
number during the pendency of the case subject to the conditions
laid down under section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha
Sanhita, 2023.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.)
Sonu/Gunjan-
[ad_1]
Source link