Mr Shakir Hussaian @ Zakir Hussaian vs State Of Karnataka on 20 January, 2025

0
120

Karnataka High Court

Mr Shakir Hussaian @ Zakir Hussaian vs State Of Karnataka on 20 January, 2025

Author: S Vishwajith Shetty

Bench: S Vishwajith Shetty

                                             -1-
                                                            NC: 2025:KHC:2238
                                                      CRL.P No. 12849 of 2024




                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                          DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025

                                           BEFORE
                      THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY
                    CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 12849 OF 2024 (439(Cr.PC) /
                                      483(BNSS))
                   BETWEEN:

                   MR SHAKIR HUSSAIN @ ZAKIR HUSSAIN
                   S/O LATE ABOOBAKER,
                   AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS,
                   R/AT. ERAVALLAPPIL HOUSE,
                   KOORKANCHERI VILLAGE, VADUKKAR POST,
                   TRISHUR, KERALA -680007.
                                                                ...PETITIONER
                   (BY SRI VIKRAM RAJ A., ADVOCATE)

                   AND:

                   STATE OF KARNATAKA
                   THROUGH MANGALURU RURAL POLICE STATION,
                   DAKSHINA KANNADA DISTRICT.
                   REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
                   HIGH COURT BUILDING,
Digitally signed   BENGALURU-560001.
by SHILPA R
TENIHALLI                                                ...RESPONDENT
                   (BY SRI M.R. PATIL, HCGP)
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA                THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 439 CR.PC (FILED U/S 483
                   BNSS) PRAYING TO RELEASE THE PETITIONER ON REGULAR
                   BAIL CONDITIONALLY PENDING TRIAL IN C.C.NO.2426/2024
                   FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 120B, 457,
                   342, 323, 324, 307, 395, 397, 506, 201 R/W SEC. 149 OF
                   INDIAN PENAL CODE, PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE HONBLE
                   III JMFC COURT, MANGALURU, WHICH IS REGISTERED IN
                   PURSUANCE OF CRIME NO.52/2024 OF MANGALURU RURAL
                   POLICE STATION BY THE RESPONDENT POLICE.

                       THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
                   ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
                                -2-
                                             NC: 2025:KHC:2238
                                       CRL.P No. 12849 of 2024




CORAM:    HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY

                         ORAL ORDER

1. Accused No.5 in Crime No.52/2024 registered by

Mangalore Rural Police Station, Mangaluru City, for the offences

punishable under Sections 120B, 457, 352, 323, 324, 307, 395,

397, 506, 201 read with Section 149 of IPC, is before this Court

under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. seeking regular bail.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

3. FIR in Crime No.52/2024 was registered by Mangalore

Rural Police Station, Mangaluru City, initially for the offences

punishable under Sections 395, 397, 506 and 149 of IPC

against unknown persons based on the first information dated

22.06.2024 received from Padmanabha Kotyan, S/o late

Lokayya Poojary. During the course of investigation, petitioner

herein was arrested on 04.07.2024 and remanded to judicial

custody. Investigation in the case is completed and charge

sheet has been filed as against 18 accused persons and the

petitioner herein is arraigned as accused No.5 in the charge

sheet. Bail application filed by the petitioner before the
-3-
NC: 2025:KHC:2238
CRL.P No. 12849 of 2024

jurisdictional Sessions Court in Crl.Misc.No.899/2024 was

rejected on 08.11.2024. Therefore, he is before this Court.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that accused

Nos.4, 8, 10 and 11 have been granted regular bail by this

Court. Petitioner has no other criminal antecedents.

Investigation in the case is completed and charge sheet has

been filed. His custody is no more required. Accordingly, he

prays to allow the petition.

5. Per contra, learned High Court Government Pleader has

opposed the petition. He submits that there is recovery in the

present case from the petitioner and his presence at the spot of

crime is found in the CCTV footage. Accused persons who have

been granted regular bail by this Court were not present at the

spot of crime. Petitioner hails from Kerala State and in the

event, he is enlarged on bail, he is likely to flee away from

justice. Accordingly, he prays to dismiss the petition.

6. A perusal of the charge sheet would go to show that

accused No.2 was the driver the tipper lorry belonging to the

first informant and he had conspired with his friend accused

No.3 to commit robbery in the house of first informant. In
-4-
NC: 2025:KHC:2238
CRL.P No. 12849 of 2024

furtherance of such conspiracy, accused No.3 allegedly

contacted accused No.4, who in turn contacted his friend

accused No.8 from Kerala, who conspired with other accused

persons and made arrangements for committing dacoity in the

house of first informant. In furtherance of said conspiracy on

21.06.2024, accused Nos.5, 6, 7, 9, 11, 12 to 18 came in two

vehicles bearing registration No.KL-08-BH-5212 and KL-45-J-

5005 and amongst the aforesaid accused, accused Nos.5, 6, 7,

12, 13, 15, 16, 17 & 18 had entered into the compound wall of

the first informant’s house at about 08.00 p.m. on 21.06.2024

and after threatening the first informant and the inmates of the

house had allegedly committed robbery of the valuables

including gold and silver jewelry and also cash and other

articles and had escaped from the spot.

7. Accused No.5 is the part of gang of 12 members which

had come in two vehicles to commit the crime and also was a

part of the gang of nine members, who had entered into the

compound wall of first informant’s house to commit the crime.

The material on record would go to show that there is recovery

in the present case from the petitioner and learned HCGP has

also submitted that his presence is found in the CCTV footage
-5-
NC: 2025:KHC:2238
CRL.P No. 12849 of 2024

of the house. Accused Nos.4, 8, 10 and 11, who have been

granted regular bail by this Court were not part of the gang

which had entered into the compound wall of house of first

informant on 21.06.2024 and allegation against the said

accused persons is about conspiracy. Gold and silver jewelry

and other valuable articles of which robbery was committed in

the present case have been recovered from accused No.13,

who was part of gang of nine members who had entered into

the compound wall of first informant’s house on 21.06.2024.

Merely for the reason that investigation in the case is

completed and charge sheet has been filed, petitioner cannot

be granted bail, more so when the charge sheet allegations

prima facie show that the accused persons have committed

heinous offence. Charge sheeted offences are punishable with

life imprisonment. Under the circumstances, I am of the opinion

that at this stage, prayer made by the petitioner for grant of

regular bail cannot be entertained. Accordingly, petition is

dismissed.

Sd/-

(S VISHWAJITH SHETTY)
JUDGE

DN/List No.: 19 Sl No.: 8/CT:PK

[ad_1]

Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here