Patna High Court – Orders
Pradeep Kumar Yadav @ Pradeep Yadav vs The State Of Bihar on 22 January, 2025
Author: Prabhat Kumar Singh
Bench: Prabhat Kumar Singh
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.80711 of 2024
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-315 Year-2021 Thana- LAUKAHA District- Madhubani
======================================================
1. Pradeep Kumar Yadav @ Pradeep Yadav Son of Lakhan Yadav R/O Village-
Malin Belha, P.S.- Laukaha (Lalmaniya O.P.), District- Madhubani
2. Umesh Kumar @ Umesh Yadav Son of Nasib Lal Yadav R/O Village- Malin
Belha, P.S.- Laukaha (Lalmaniya O.P.), District- Madhubani
3. Dukhi Yadav Son of Sitaram Yadav R/O Village- Malin Belha, P.S.- Laukaha
(Lalmaniya O.P.), District- Madhubani
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Jitendra Kumar Bharti, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anand Kishore Choudhary, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH
ORAL ORDER
2 22-01-2025
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and
learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case
registered under Sections 147, 149, 188, 447, 341, 342, 323,
332, 333, 353, 307, 427, 379, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal
Code.
3. As per the prosecution case, a mob of about 400- 500
people created disturbance at Booth Nos. 53 & 54 and also not
allowed to move away the E.V.M. machine and assaulted the
police party.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners
submits that petitioners are not named in the First Information
Report. Their names have transpired during course of
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.80711 of 2024(2) dt.22-01-2025
2/2
investigation. Allegations are general and omnibus. Similarly
situated several co-accused persons have already been granted
anticipatory bail by this Court, vide orders dated 02.04.2024 and
12.07.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. Nos. 19565 of 2024 and 33668
of 2024 respectively. Petitioners claim clean antecedent.
5. Learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State
opposed the bail application.
6. Having considered the aforesaid facts and
circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioners be
released on bail, in the event of arrest or surrender before the
learned court below within a period of eight weeks from today,
on furnishing bail-bonds of Rs. 10,000 (Rupees Ten Thousand)
each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction
of learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Jhanjharpur,
Madhubani, in connection with Laukaha (Lalmaniya) P.S. Case
No. 315 of 2021 corresponding to G.R. Case No. 1667 of 2021,
subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of
the Cr. P.C.
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)
utkarsh/-
U T
[ad_1]
Source link