Gopal Agrawal vs State Of Odisha …. Opposite Party on 24 January, 2025

Orissa High Court

Gopal Agrawal vs State Of Odisha …. Opposite Party on 24 January, 2025

Author: Murahari Sri Raman

Bench: Murahari Sri Raman

                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
                            TRPCRL No.7 of 2025

            Gopal Agrawal                            ....           Petitioner
                                      Mr. Sudeep Kumar Sarangi, Advocate
                                       -versus-
            State of Odisha                          ....       Opposite party
                            Mr. Anshuman Sethy, Additional Standing Counsel

                                   CORAM:
                   HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN

Order No.                                ORDER
   01.                                  24.01.2025

This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode.

2. Mr. Sudeep Kumar Sarangi, learned counsel appearing for
the petitioner submitted that the matter arises out of one incident,
and involves case and counter case. The charge-sheet have been
submitted to be tried for offences under Sections 147, 148, 341,
323, 294, 325, 354, 307 and 149 of the IPC in one PS Case and the
other is triable for offences under Sections 341, 294, 323, 324, 326,
506 and 34 of the IPC.

2.1. He submitted that while C.T. Case No.543 of 2018 is triable
by Judicial Magistrate First Class, Nuapada, the other one being
C.T. Case No.542 of 2018 is committed to the Court of Sessions as
offence inter alia related to Sections 307/149 of the IPC. He has
made a prayer before the learned Sessions Court and the Sessions
Judge, Nuapada has rejected the prayer for transfer of the case
pending before the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Nuapada
(JMFC). He places reliance on a Judgment of Hon’ble Supreme
Court in the case of State of Madhya Pradesh Vrs. Mishrilal and
others (2003) 9 SCC 426. Referring to paragraph 8 of the said
Page 1 of 2
judgment, he submitted that grave miscarriage of justice would be
ensued, if both the cases are not tried in one Court, i.e., the learned
counsel Additional Sessions Judge, Nuapada.

3. At this stage, Mr. Anshuman Sethy, learned Additional
Standing Counsel seeks short accommodation to examine the
applicability of the said reported judgment to the facts of the case.

4. List this matter on 18.02.2025.

5. The petitioner is at liberty to file application seeking
adjournment of the proceeding, which may be considered by the
concerned Court(s) for deferring further proceeding beyond
18.02.2025.

(M.S. Raman)
Judge
Suchitra

Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed
Signed by: SUCHITRA BEHERA
Page 2 of 2
Reason: Authentication
Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, CUTTACK
Date: 24-Jan-2025 18:11:04