Vijay Kumar @ Vijay Kumar Yadav @ Vijay … vs The State Of Bihar on 24 January, 2025

Patna High Court – Orders

Vijay Kumar @ Vijay Kumar Yadav @ Vijay … vs The State Of Bihar on 24 January, 2025

Author: Anshuman

Bench: Anshuman

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.56330 of 2024
                         Arising Out of PS. Case No.-12 Year-2023 Thana- PALI District- Jehanabad
                 ======================================================
                 Vijay Kumar @ Vijay Kumar Yadav @ Vijay Yadav son of Late Naresh yadav
                 Village- Nichali Gali Yadav Tola Ps- Rajgir Dist- Nalanda
                                                                           ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                    Versus
           1.     The State of Bihar
           2.     Ram Vinay Bind S/o Late Mahendra Bind R/o vill - Utar Serthu, P.s. - Pali,
                  Dist. - Jehanabad
                                                                    ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr.Dhananjay Kumar, Adv.
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr.Mohammad Sufyan, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN
                                       ORAL ORDER

5   24-01-2025

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned

A.P.P. for the State and Learned Counsel for the Opposite Party

No.2.

2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with

Pali P.S. Case No.12 of 2023 lodged under Sections 363, 366A,

368, 370A, 372, 373, 376, 379, 411/34 of the I.P.C. read with

Sections 3, 6, 8, 10 and 17 of the POCSO Act. read with Section

3, 4, 5, 8 and 9 of the Immoral Trafficking (Prevention) Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, the F.I.R. has been

lodged against unknown accused person with allegation that the

informant’s daughter who is aged about 13 years, was

kidnapped.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.56330 of 2024(5) dt.24-01-2025
2/2

petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He submits

that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He

further submits that the victim girl has left her house at her own

consent.

5. Counsel further submits that petitioner is in custody

since 01.02.2023 having clean antecedent. He further submits

that the main accused, who has sold the victim, has been granted

bail and the petitioner is only bare purchaser.

6. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer

for bail.

7. Learned Counsel for the Opposite Party No.2 is

present and submits that all witnesses have been examined

except doctor and I.O. of this case.

8. In the present facts and circumstances of this case

and the submissions made above, this Court is not inclined to

grant bail to the petitioner. Therefore, the bail application of the

petitioner is hereby rejected.

9. However, Trial Court is directed to conclude the

trial as earliest as possible.

(Dr. Anshuman, J.)
Prakashmani/-

U      T