Patna High Court – Orders
Niraj Kumar Singh @ Niraj Kumar vs The State Of Bihar on 24 January, 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4446 of 2025
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-231 Year-2023 Thana- CHANDRADIP District- Jamui
======================================================
Niraj Kumar Singh @ Niraj Kumar S/o Ashok Singh R/o Village- Sonkhar,
P.S.- Chandradeep, District- Jamui
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sanju Singh, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Yogendra Kumar, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH
MISHRA
ORAL ORDER
2 24-01-2025
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
APP representing the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection
with Chandradeep P.S. Case No. 231 of 2023 registered for the
offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323,
332, 225, 333, 307, 337, 338, 353, 427, 504, 506 of the Indian
Penal Code.
3. As per prosecution case, accusation against the
accused persons along with the petitioner is of obstructing the
police party from performing their official duty and pelting
bricks and stones upon the police party as well as causing
damage to the police vehicle.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4446 of 2025(2) dt.24-01-2025
2/3
petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the
present case. He further submits that nothing incriminating has
been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner.
The petitioner has no criminal antecedent as has been stated in
paragraph no.3 of the present anticipatory bail application. He
further submits that as per impugned order, no one sustained any
injury in the alleged occurrence. There is no direct or specific
allegation of any overt act against the petitioner rather the same
is general and omnibus in nature. There is no eye-witness who
have supported the prosecution version. Learned counsel for the
petitioner further submits that the co-accused Rajesh Kumar,
Munnu Singh @ Munnu Kumar, Chunnu Singh and Suraj
Kumar have been granted regular bail by this Court vide orders
dated 23.08.2024 and 30.08.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 59020
of 2024 and 62071 of 2024 respectively.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for
anticipatory bail of the petitioner, stating that the offence alleged
in the occurrence is serious in nature and, hence, he does not
deserve privilege of anticipatory bail.
6. Considering the entire facts and circumstances of
the case and taking into account the submissions made by the
learned counsel for the petitioner, let the petitioner above-
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4446 of 2025(2) dt.24-01-2025
3/3
named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned
Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be
released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of
Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like
amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where
the case is pending/successor court in connection with
Chandradeep P.S. Case No. 231 of 2023, subject to the
conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the B.N.S.S.
(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J)
rishi/-
U T
[ad_1]
Source link
