B.Omana vs State Of Kerala on 27 January, 2025

0
122

[WP(C) Nos.13434/2017, 3730/2021, 4219/2021, 6155/2021,

18456/2021, 37554/2024]

In WP (C) 13434 of 2017, the petitioners challenge Exhibit P49

order dated 13.01.2016, issued by the 3rd respondent Kerala Khadi and

Village Industries Board, rejecting the claim for counting prior service

rendered by Spinning/Weaving Inspectors before regularisation for

pensionary benefits. It is stated that the petitioners are retired

employees of the Khadi Board, who joined the service between the

1970s and 80s and worked as Spinning Instructors and Weaving

Instructors. They were regularised in service from 07.07.1999 through

an order issued by the 1st respondent, but the period of service before

the date of regularisation was not counted for pension. At the same

time, all the petitioners have received gratuity through the order

passed by the Controlling Authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act,

1972 by counting the entire service as a qualifying service.



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here