Jharkhand High Court
Parwez Ansari vs The State Of Jharkhand …. …. …. … on 28 January, 2025
Author: Anil Kumar Choudhary
Bench: Anil Kumar Choudhary
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
A.B.A. No.478 of 2025
------
Parwez Ansari, aged about 48 years, Son of Jabir Ansari, Resident of
Village- Murum, P.O.- Sadkanandu, P.S.- Kanke, District- Ranchi.
…. …. …. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand …. …. …. Opposite Party
——
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
——
For the Petitioner : Mr. Amit Kr. Choubey, Advocate
For the State : Mr. Azeemuddin, Addl. P.P
------
Order No.02 Dated- 28-01-2025
Heard the parties.
Apprehending his arrest in connection with Kanke P.S. Case No.04 of
2019 registered under Sections 147, 148, 149, 152, 153, 332, 333, 337, 338, 353,
307, 427, 435, 436 of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 3 of Prevention
of Damage to Public Property Act, the petitioner has moved this Court for
grant of privileges of anticipatory bail.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the
allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner being member of an
unlawful assembly and being armed with deadly weapons attempted to
murder the public servant-police personnel. It is submitted that the
allegations against the petitioner are all false and there is no allegation of any
injury being sustained by anybody and the allegations are general and
omnibus in nature. It is next submitted that there is no basis upon which the
petitioner has been implicated in this case and the petitioner has no criminal
antecedent as has been mentioned in paragraph No.20 of the anticipatory
bail application. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes to
cooperate with the investigation of the case. It is lastly submitted that the co-
accused, with similar allegations, has already been given the privileges of
anticipatory bail by this Court vide order dated 01.12.2023 passed in A.B.A.
No.3984 of 2023. Hence, it is submitted that on the principle of parity, the
petitioner be also given the privileges of anticipatory bail.
Learned Addl. P.P appearing for the State opposes the prayer for
anticipatory bail of the petitioner.
Considering the submissions of learned counsels and the facts and
circumstances stated above, I am inclined to grant privileges of anticipatory
bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to surrender in
the Court below within six weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or
surrendering, he will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of
Rs.25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each
to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Ranchi in connection with Kanke P.S.
Case No.04 of 2019 with the condition that he will co-operate with the
investigation of the case and appear before the investigating officer as and
when noticed by him and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of
the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile
number during the pendency of the case and further conditions as laid
down under Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.)
Animesh/
[ad_1]
Source link