Yougeshwar Sardar @ Yugeshwar Sardar vs The State Of Bihar on 30 January, 2025

Patna High Court – Orders

Yougeshwar Sardar @ Yugeshwar Sardar vs The State Of Bihar on 30 January, 2025

Author: Satyavrat Verma

Bench: Satyavrat Verma

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.59479 of 2024
                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-232 Year-2023 Thana- KURSAKANTA District- Araria
                 ======================================================
           1.     Yougeshwar Sardar @ Yugeshwar Sardar S/o- Ganeshi Sardar Village-
                  Shishabadi Ps- Kursakanta Kuari OP Dist- Araria
           2.    Shamshul @ Md. Shamshul son of Bandal Mian @ Bachchu Mian Village-
                 Shishabadi Ps- Kursakanta Kuari OP Dist- Araria
           3.    Vikash Kumar Singh son of Vinod Singh @ Vinod Kumar Singh Village-
                 Shishabadi Ps- Kursakanta Kuari OP Dist- Araria
           4.     Murtuja @ Md. Murtuj son of Md. Jamruddin Village- Shishabadi Ps-
                  Kursakanta Kuari OP Dist- Araria
                                                                      ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                   Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                               ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Ravindra Nath Dubey
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Lalan Kumar
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   30-01-2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned

A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case

registered for the offences punishable under Sections 337, 147,

149, 341, 342, 323, 324, 325, 353, 332, 338, 333, 307, 224, 225,

427, 120B, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the

petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and the informant

alleges that he received an information while patrolling that some

home guard jawans of Excise Police are being assaulted by

antisocial elements, accordingly, he reached the place of

occurrence, where 50-60 people started abusing and attacked the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.59479 of 2024(2) dt.30-01-2025
2/2

vehicle of the informant and even tried to tear the uniform of other

police personnel and government vehicle was also damaged.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that

petitioners have been falsely implicated in the instant case. It is

next submitted that from perusal of allegation as alleged in the

FIR, it would manifest that the allegation against the petitioners is

general and omnibus in nature.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for

anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned

counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners above-named, in the

event of their arrest or surrender before the learned trial court

within a period of six weeks from today, be released on

anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees

Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to

the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is

pending/successor court in connection with Kursakant (Kuari) P.S.

Case No. 232 of 2023, subject to the conditions as laid down under

Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Satyavrat Verma, J)
amit/-

U        T