Mahesh Enterprises vs Sri.Mrutyunjaya Traders on 1 February, 2025

Date:

Karnataka High Court

Mahesh Enterprises vs Sri.Mrutyunjaya Traders on 1 February, 2025

Author: Ravi V.Hosmani

Bench: Ravi V.Hosmani

                                                -1-
                                                            NC: 2025:KHC-D:2043
                                                      CRL.RP No. 100074 of 2019




                                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
                                         DHARWAD BENCH

                              DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025

                                              BEFORE

                              THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V.HOSMANI

                         CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.100074 OF 2019
                                    (397(Cr.PC)/438(BNSS)]

                       BETWEEN:

                       MAHESH ENTERPRISES
                       ITS PROP: MAHESHAPPA MURIGEPPA UPPIN,
                       AGE: YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS,
                       R/O: BANDAR ROAD, MANGALURU,
                       STATE: KARNATAKA.
                                                                  ... PETITIONER
                       (BY SRI NAVEEN CHATRAD, ADVOCATE)

                       AND:

                       SRI MRUTYUNJAYA TRADERS
                       REPRESENTED BY PROP: MAHADEVAPPA
                       S/O. UJJAPPA MALLAPPANAVAR,
          Digitally
          signed by
                       AGE: 48 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS,
                       R/O: BYADGI, DIST: HAVERI,
          MANJANNA E
MANJANNA
E        Date:
         2025.02.01
          15:46:11
          +0530
                       STATE: KARNATAKA.
                                                                 ... RESPONDENT
                       (BY SRI S.B.PATIL, ADVOCATE (VAKALATH FILED))

                            THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S. 397
                       R/W. 401 OF CR.P.C. SEEKING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT
                       AND ORDER DATED 19.12.2018 PASSED BY THE LEARNED II-
                       ADDL. DIST. & SESSIONS JUDGE, HAVERI, SITTING AT
                       RANEBENNUR IN CRL.A.NO.91/2015, CONFIRMING THE
                       JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF CONVICTION DATED 07.09.2015
                       PASSED BY THE LEARNED CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, BYADGI, IN
                       C.C.NO.188/2009 FOR THE OFFENCES P/U/S.138 OF NI ACT.
                                        -2-
                                                            NC: 2025:KHC-D:2043
                                               CRL.RP No. 100074 of 2019




    THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

                                  ORAL ORDER

(PER: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V.HOSMANI)

Challenging judgment/order dated 07.09.2015 passed by

Civil Judge and JMFC., Byadgi in C.C.no.188/2009 and

judgment/order dated 19.12.2018 passed by II Addl. District

and Sessions Judge, Haveri, sitting at Ranebennur in Crl.Appeal

no.91/2015, this revision petition is filed.

2. Sri Naveen Chatrad, learned counsel for petitioner

and Sri S. B. Patil, learned counsel for respondent jointly

submitted that matter is settled between parties and a

compromise petition is filed under Section 147 of Negotiable

Instruments Act, 1881, wherein, it is stated as under:

“1. It is submitted that Petitioner has filed the
above Criminal Revision Petition against the
judgment and order dated 19-12-2018 passed by
the Ld. II Addl. Dist. & Sessions Judge, Haveri,
Sitting at Ranebennur in Criminal Appeal
No.91/2015, confirming the judgment and order of
conviction dated 07-09-2015 passed by the Ld.
Civil Judge and JMFC Byadgi, in C.C.No.188/2009
for the offence punishable under section 138 of NI
-3-
NC: 2025:KHC-D:2043
CRL.RP No. 100074 of 2019

Act, whereby The trial court after appreciation of
the evidence on record Acting U/s 255 (2) of
Cr.P.C.the accused is convicted for the offence
punishable U/s 138 of N.I.Act. The accused is
sentenced to undergo S.I. for a period of 1 year
and also pay fine of Rs.4,000/- In default, the
accused shall undergo S.I. for a period of 3
months. Acting U/s 357 (3) of Cr.P.C. the accused
is directed to pay compensation amount of
Rs.65,000/- to the complainant. The fine amount
of Rs.4,000/- shall be deposited to the state. It is
submitted that Accused/petitioner has taken to the
custody and now he is in judicial custody.
Therefore the son of the accused is entering into
compromise and signing this petition and filing the
affidavit. However the Accused will file separate
affidavit in support of the compromise immediately
after release from the custody.

2. It is submitted that during the pendency of the
above petition due to intervention of elders and
mediation of the well wishers both the Petitioner
and Respondent have amicably settled the above
case on the following terms and conditions:

i) that the Respondent / Complainant has
agreed to receive Rs. 65,000/- (Rupees
Sixty Five Thousand only)as full and final
settlement amount. Out of the same he has
already received Rs. 15,000/-(Rupees
Fifteen Thousand only) by cash and today
-4-
NC: 2025:KHC-D:2043
CRL.RP No. 100074 of 2019

he is receiving balance agreed of Rs.

50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only)by
way of cash from the Petitioner/Accused
before this Hon’ble Court.

ii) that the Respondent/ Complainant has no
objection to set aside the order of convictions
passed by the courts below.”

3. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that since

petitioner i.e., Maheshappa Murigeppa Uppin is in custody, his

son Shailesh S/o. Mahesh Uppin is before this Court and has

not only signed on compromise petition but also undertakes to

comply with terms of compromise.

4. Sri Mahadevappa S/o. Ujjappa Mallappanavar i.e.,

complainant is present and identified by his counsel. He

knowledges receipt of entire amount as mentioned in

compromise petition.

5. Compromise petition is taken on record.

6. In view of above compromise, revision petition

requires to be allowed. Hence, following:
-5-

NC: 2025:KHC-D:2043
CRL.RP No. 100074 of 2019

ORDER

i) Criminal Revision Petition is allowed.

ii) Impugned judgment/order dated 07.09.2015
passed by Civil Judge and JMFC., Byadgi in
C.C.no.188/2009 and judgment/order dated
19.12.2018 passed by II Addl. District and
Sessions Judge, Haveri, sitting at Ranebennur
in Crl.Appeal no.91/2015 are set aside.

iii) Revision petitioner is ordered to be released
from custody, forthwith.

iv) Intimate to concerned Jail Authority
immediately.

SD/-

(RAVI V.HOSMANI)
JUDGE

RH
CT:PA
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 18



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Share post:

Subscribe

spot_imgspot_img

Popular

More like this
Related