Abc vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 7 March, 2025

0
19

This Criminal Revision has been filed under Section 102 of the

Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 (hereinafter

referred to as “J.J. Act”) against the order impugned dated 06.06.2024

passed by the learned First Additional Sessions Judge, Janjgir-Champa

in Criminal Appeal No.53/2024 arising out of Crime No.18/2024 for

commission of offences under Sections 363,302,201, 120-B, 147,148

and 149 of IPC whereby appeal has been dismissed and the order

dated 24.04.2024, passed by the Principal Magistrate Juvenile Justice

Board, Janjgir in Cr. Case No. 63/2024 rejecting the bail application of

child in conflict with law has been affirmed.

2. As per prosecution case, on 09.01.2024, at about 12.30 p,.

complainant Mukund Yadav lodged a missing report alleging that his

son namely Rajesh Yadav, student of class 11 went with one Deepak

Tandon in his motorcycle to seethe cultural program at Godna and did

not return. He was having suspicion that his son might have been

abducted and therefore the report was lodged against unknown persons

under Section 363 IPC. Thereafter on 12.01.2024, at about 10.00 pm.

dead body of the his son was found near Barbhata canal. During merg

inquiry, the police collected the evidence against the present

applicants/juvenile in conflict with law that the applicants were

classmates of the deceased and the applicant No.1 and the deceased

were liking their schoolmate (girl). Memorandum statements of the

juvenile in conflict with law were recorded and the clothes and weapon

of offence were seized. The juveniles were found to be 17 years and 11

months and 16 years of age, respectively.



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here