Abhijit Swain vs Unknown on 5 March, 2025

0
24


Abhijit Swain vs Unknown on 5 March, 2025


Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side)

Abhijit Swain vs Unknown on 5 March, 2025

Author: Debangsu Basak

Bench: Debangsu Basak

  05.03.2025
    DL-24
   Court No.26                              CRM (DB) 4397 of 2024
(Dismissed as not pressed)
      (AD)


                      In re : An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of
                      Criminal Procedure, 1973 corresponding to Section 483 of the
                      Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with
                      Case No.ST-3(9)2024 corresponding with Special (SPL)-71/2024
                      dated 16.04.2024 arising out of Baguiati Police Station Case
                      No.231     of  2024     dated    16.04.2024    under    Sections
                      343/366A/366B/368/370(4)/372/373/376/120B               of   the
                      Indian Penal Code, 1860, Sections 4/17 of the POCSO Act,
                      2012, Sections 65/66 of I.T. Act and Section 5 of Immoral Traffic
                      Prevention Act and 14A of the Foreigners Act.
                                                  -And-

                      In the matter of : Abhijit Swain
                                                                         ... ...Petitioner
                      Mr. Sekhar Kuamr Basu, Ld. Sr. Advocate
                      Mr. Kajal Mukherjee, Advocate
                      Mr. Abir Ranjan Neogi, Advocate
                      Mr. Bikash Chakraborty, Advocate
                      Mr. Karon Bapuli, Advocate
                                                       ... ... For the Petitioner

                      Mr. Soumik Ganguli, Advocate
                      Mr. Arup Sarkar, Advocate
                                                            ... ... For the State.


                        1.

Learned Senior Advocate appearing for the petitioner submits

that, since the application for bail of another co-accused was

rejected today, he does not want to press the present

application.

2. State is represented.

3. In such circumstances, CRM (DB) 4397 of 2024 is

dismissed as not pressed.

(Debangsu Basak, J.)

(Md. Shabbar Rashidi, J.)

Now Is the Time to Think About Your Small-Business Success

Find people with high expectations and a low tolerance...

Program Will Lend $10M to Detroit Minority Businesses

Find people with high expectations and a low tolerance...

Kansas City Has a Massive Array of Big National Companies

Find people with high expectations and a low tolerance...